We performed a comparison between GoToWebinar and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We were able to build our own customer portal and integrate into GoToWebinar with a seamless interface."
"I can extract the activity and the attendance reports, along with every single question that was asked during the webinar, which is a feature that we highly value."
"The interface is browser-based and simple, which is an advantage over other solutions."
"All of their features are good. They are more or less equivalent to the competition. There's less disturbance, less jitter, the voice is always good even at a low bandwidth."
"This solution is very reliable. It is easy to switch between audio and microphone when using headphones."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling feature which makes it easier to work on the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to have remote meetings with customers and colleagues."
"The Audio Call feature is its most valuable feature."
"Valuable screen sharing feature."
"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications."
"The most valuable features are the messaging and the video calling, especially where you can add a background."
"The most valuable features are visual and audio, as they are very clear with no interruptions."
"The corporate world widely accepts the solution for virtual meetings. Also, it has good availability."
"The platform feels old and a little rusty, more could be invested into the look and feel of it."
"The sharing of cameras is limited to meeting organizers."
"GoToWebinar would be improved with the inclusion of support for video endpoints."
"Some of my friends also use GoToWebinar to collect clients for affiliate marketing. In those cases, they found some features were missing with respect to some of the competition. And the worst part is the price."
"The chat window and using polls is easier in Zoom than compared to GoToWebinar. Make it simpler and easier to publish polls on the fly would improve the solution."
"The software could be optimized for Mac systems because sometimes it is slow and consumes a lot of memory."
"Its stability could be better."
"Its screen-sharing feature could be better compared to a few competitors."
"The user interface is non-intuitive and should be improved."
"The call quality could be better sometimes. Microsoft could improve the quality of the backgrounds. File sharing could also be smoother. It takes a lot of clicks to download and copy the links. It should be only one click."
"The solution needs to have subtitles."
"The product is immature and lacks some of the features and functionality you would expect in a collaboration tool."
"Adding and integrating more apps like SharePoint on Microsoft Teams is making the solution very slow."
GoToWebinar is ranked 18th in Virtual Meetings with 8 reviews while Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews. GoToWebinar is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GoToWebinar writes "Video library is a great tool and it enables good customization; feels a little antiquated and rusty". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". GoToWebinar is most compared with Webex, GoToMeeting and Zoom, whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Bitrix24. See our GoToWebinar vs. Microsoft Teams report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.