We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure App Service is that it's a PaaS. I also like that it supports Docker and multiple frameworks so that you can work on Java, Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Python."
"The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the easy deployment, the scalability, and the Azure maintenance."
"I've used Microsoft Azure App Service quite a lot, and what I like best about it is that it's a serverless HAM, which is a feature that can run a function, a single function, but faster and more frequently without needing any other assistance. This has been what I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure App Service, the serverless option that's very easy to utilize, and you only need a minimal setup to use this and to enjoy the functionalities required, so the solution gives me a lot of comfort whenever I'm using it."
"The feature I find most valuable is the 'Diagnose and Solve problem' function. This not only allows us to fix a problem, but also to generate analytics on why the issue occurred."
"The product is scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is autoscaling and resource grouping. Additionally, the integration works well, it is easy to do."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"Fast prototyping."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"Sometimes we face problems, but those are technical problems in Microsoft, bugs or something doesn't work as expected, but that's normal."
"The outbound connectivity is not great."
"The solution is somewhat expensive."
"I want more transparency in billing. It would be better if we could understand and control the billing to customize it. Also, Microsoft should provide more guidance about the widgets and subsets of various products. The Microsoft portfolio is so huge that it's sometimes difficult to choose the correct option. There's always a chance we are paying more than necessary."
"There is still room for improvement in terms of the maturity of the solution. Everything is available that we need, but the issue is that they are still upgrading. Even though they have Azure applications and automation services, they still need to mature more. There are many things that need to mature and the road map for this is quite long, taking another three to eight years to have a mature solution."
"Lacking somewhat in template data flows."
"The pricing is average. It could be lower."
"App Service sometimes becomes very slow to respond, and it can be difficult to find the issue causing this."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"The initial setup takes time."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"UI needs improvement."
"This is an expensive solution."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there."
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 38 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 56 reviews. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Appian and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and Bizagi. See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
