We compared Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Zoho CRM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Microsoft Dynamics CRM is considered robust and reliable. Users praised its ability to measure and track sales and seamless integration with Microsoft Office 365 and Azure. Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Dynamics CRM requires improvement in terms of mobile experience, interface design, and performance. Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation.
Service and Support: Reviews of Microsoft support were mixed, with some users expressing frustration at long response times and challenges contacting the support team. Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability.
Ease of Deployment: Some Microsoft Dynamics users found the setup uncomplicated, while others struggled with it. Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months.
Pricing: The cost of Microsoft Dynamics depends on factors like licenses and customization. While Dynamics is generally considered expensive, some users find the pricing fair or slightly cheaper compared to competitors. Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment.
ROI: Microsoft Dynamics CRM provides a significant ROI due to its upgraded features and integrations. Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment.
Comparison Results: Users like Microsoft Dynamics CRM for its native integration with popular Microsoft products, but some users have said that setting up Microsoft Dynamics can be complex and time-consuming. Others have suggested lowering the price and improving the interface. Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited.
"My access to Microsoft Dynamics CRM is limited, so I can only access the feature of registering the pipeline and activities. That feature is enough for me to do the job, and is what I find most valuable in the solution."
"The Outlook calendar has been very helpful for us."
"One of the most useful features is we can configure Microsoft Dynamics CRM in the way that we need. This is configurable."
"The product is user-friendly."
"The history of engagement with our customers, including all conversations, has been most valuable when using this solution."
"It integrates well with other Microsoft products."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics CRM is the flexibility with Microsoft Office 365."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM has a very nice UI, and is very easy to use. It's easy to install, has a lot of features, and provides good technical support."
"The most valuable feature of Zoho CRM is its ease of use."
"The product is customizable."
"The camera feature is valuable because it provides a look and feel."
"There are many features that capture customer data."
"Zoho CRM is easy to use and easy to understand."
"Zoho CRM integrates easily with customer service workflows."
"One of the most important features is that it's a cloud base and, it's also quite cheaper when compared to other solutions. Zoho CRM is customizable as per your requirement and, the Zoho team is able to help you to customize the CRM based on your requirements, and you can integrate to any third-party solution."
"It also provides robust reporting capabilities to analyze and report on these key aspects of customer relationship management."
"A built-in automation engine to automate parts of workflows would be beneficial. That's the feature I'd be most happy to see expanded. It's currently tagged as simple automation, but I'd love some predictive capability."
"The UI could definitely be improved."
"One area for improvement in Microsoft Dynamics CRM is its end user feedback. It's still not that great compared to Salesforce. They also need to improve on the look and feel of the solution, because those are still slightly better on Salesforce."
"The options for customizing Microsoft Dynamics CRM are very limited or highly complex."
"This CRM system needs to be more configurable. Its performance still needs improvement, because its screens hang while querying data. It's also not highly scalable, so scalability also needs improvement."
"Microsoft Dynamics CRM could improve the built-in reports. The ones that are included are pretty generic unless you subscribe to Microsoft BI, which is an extra fee. They should offer the reports without having to purchase a separate subscription for Microsoft BI. However, the reports in Microsoft BI are fantastic."
"Overall, the solution could be made to be more user friendly."
"Dynamic's management could be improved. The tech management should have better technical capabilities."
"The customization options for roles in Zoho CRM are currently limited."
"The process of creating reports is not very user-friendly - it takes time, and it's confusing."
"There are at least two big pieces. One is just the ability to reorganize the data and clean it up to eliminate duplicates and things like that. It is very manual at the moment. It only gives us certain fields that we can check on. Because of our particular database, it creates a problem. We deal with hospitals, and there are 50 hospitals. It is tough to figure out which one is which. Is it this one or the other one? So, trying to clean things up is very difficult. I'd like to have more ability to share data fields. The data is structured into different buckets, and I frequently have to create the same field in two different buckets. It would be nice if I could just do a view-only field in another bucket. In my contact bucket, I would like to be able to have just a view-only of the account information so that I don't need to enter it again, which is what I have to do currently."
"The reporting for developers should be improved."
"There are two things I would like to see from Zoho CRM. The first would be to include a calling feature that is connected to our call center. Second, I would like financial targeting and how to measure targeting for the sales agent to be connected better with bookings."
"I would like to see more integrations and customization options in the next release."
"The integration should be more user-friendly."
"Custom development is often necessary to make such extensive changes, and it does come with associated costs."
Microsoft Dynamics CRM is ranked 2nd in CRM with 68 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 47 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics CRM is rated 7.6, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics CRM writes "Intuitive APIs, customizable design, but dashboards could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". Microsoft Dynamics CRM is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud, SAP CRM, ServiceNow, Siebel CRM and Salesforce Marketing Cloud, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, LeadSquared and Odoo. See our Microsoft Dynamics CRM vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Sales Force Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.