We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and PingID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."
"The product allows customization via custom code."
"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."
"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."
"The product was built to be scalable."
"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."
"The scalability of the solution is good. We haven't felt we've been restricted from expanding as necessary and we haven't heard of any issues from our clients."
"We use the product to run different reports."
"The only feature we were looking for in PingID was SSO integration with our existing web app."
"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."
"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."
"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."
"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."
"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."
"It's pretty stable as a product."
"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."
"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."
"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."
"There are problems with stability."
"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."
"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."
"The technical support is not very good at all."
"The product is complicated and difficult to install and configure."
"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."
"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."
"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."
"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."
"They could use some bio-certification. It's just more user-friendly and more convenient than entering the one time passes. That would be an improvement."
"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."
"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."
"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."
Oracle Access Manager is ranked 10th in Access Management with 15 reviews while PingID is ranked 7th in Authentication Systems with 14 reviews. Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6, while PingID is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "A convenient solution that supports customization and provides many features in a single suite". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes " A robust cloud-based multi-factor solution with a good customer support team". Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Auth0, whereas PingID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID. See our Oracle Access Manager vs. PingID report.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.