We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Oracle Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."ForgeRock is an extensive product with many functionalities and capabilities, much more than many other tools combined."
"Easy to navigate, handle and manage the applications."
"We have found the identity and access management tools in the solution to be particularly useful for our organization."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."
"The support is good and prompt."
"ForgeRock products are customizable, and the out-of-the-box features are solid, too. I primarily use the OIDC compliance features. It's just a configuration. it's easy to set up and customize trees. We can add our own features if necessary. Banks and corporations have different standards and specific validations."
"The product is easy to set up."
"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."
"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."
"The product supports customization."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."
"The product was built to be scalable."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."
"Once it is set up, it is easy to use and it integrates with most of the products on the market."
"Lacks simplified documentation within the tool that requires use of a separate portal."
"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement."
"We raised tickets asking for improvements, but sometimes we don't get the proper solution. They are responding, but the ticket is open for weeks and weeks. For some issues, we don't get a satisfactory solution or the solution doesn't work."
"I think the upgrade process is sometimes a little complicated and there are failures that occur."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"The solution could improve by adding more advertising and marketing."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"The technical support is not very good at all."
"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."
"In the next release, they should focus more on use cases related to customer access management, customer identity, and access management."
"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."
"There are problems with stability."
"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow."
"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."
"Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities."
ForgeRock is ranked 4th in Access Management with 27 reviews while Oracle Access Manager is ranked 10th in Access Management with 15 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Oracle Access Manager is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Access Manager writes "A convenient solution that supports customization and provides many features in a single suite". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingID, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Oracle Access Manager is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) and PingID. See our ForgeRock vs. Oracle Access Manager report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
