We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Temenos Quantum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are case management and integration services."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms."
"The visualizer and API manager are super useful. It's easy to create applications for the agent. Automations and other complex tasks can be hard, but it's mostly straightforward. You can create forms and populate tables."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoother experience with the other."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"Some features are only enabled for paid users. It would be much better if they enabled those features without having to pay. I would also like to see them publish information about future technologies on the Home screen under a separate tab. That would be an improvement."
"Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 55 reviews while Temenos Quantum is ranked 19th in Rapid Application Development Software with 15 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Temenos Quantum is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Temenos Quantum writes "Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas Temenos Quantum is most compared with OutSystems, Microsoft Azure App Service and ServiceNow. See our Pega BPM vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
