We compared TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
TeamViewer is praised for its ease of use and reliable remote access, while suggestions for improvement highlight the need for enhanced performance and interface simplicity. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access and collaboration capabilities, with mixed feedback on pricing and licensing. Users highlight the excellent customer support and significant ROI, but suggest improvements in interface usability and performance.
Features: The valuable features of TeamViewer include ease of use, reliable remote access, seamless screen sharing, efficient file transfer, and exceptional customer support. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access, seamless collaboration, extensive device compatibility, reliable security measures, and excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for TeamViewer is reported to be relatively low, which is seen as a benefit. However, feedback on the setup cost for TeamViewer Tensor is mixed. Some users praised the ease of setup and the lack of significant costs, while others expressed concerns about the licensing process.It may not be straightforward or transparent., TeamViewer's ROI is reported as positive, with users highlighting seamless remote access and cost-effectiveness. TeamViewer Tensor provided a significant ROI, enhancing productivity, reducing travel expenses, and offering robust security measures.
Room for Improvement: TeamViewer has room for improvement in terms of speed, responsiveness, interface simplicity, audio and video quality, customer support, and advanced security features. On the other hand, TeamViewer Tensor needs enhancements in interface usability, performance, user-friendliness, speed, responsiveness, file transfers, and operating system compatibility.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews comparing TeamViewer to TeamViewer Tensor highlight that while some users of TeamViewer spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, others only needed a week for both deployment and setup. In contrast, TeamViewer Tensor users mentioned spending multiple months on deployment, along with an additional week for setup., TeamViewer's customer service has received positive remarks for both products. Users praise the helpfulness, promptness, and effectiveness of the assistance provided. The customer service experience is considered reliable and efficient for TeamViewer, while TeamViewer Tensor stands out for its exceptional support levels.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"
"The product is quite stable. The performance is good."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ease of connecting to remote computers. I do not need a lot of information about their computers to connect, a nontechnical person can give me the information needed for me to connect. Additionally, the solution does not gather other system information about the host or client's systems as other solutions might, such as AnyDesk."
"The implementation is quite straightforward."
"The product allows easy access to any system in case of any issues."
"I have been satisfied with TeamViewer overall."
"It's a user-friendly product."
"It is quite simple to set up."
"This product is very simple to use and you can connect whether you are behind a firewall or not."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access."
"Remote desktop sharing is one valuable feature of the solution."
"The solution could have better scalability."
"TeamViewer is expensive, and you get a limited number of connections for your money."
"It's pretty limited on the options they have."
"The file transfer functionality crashes sometimes."
"I would like to see something like a TeamViewer mobile application for iOS or possibly Android. I think this would be fantastic given how technology is evolving today. It would be beneficial to use it with your smartphone."
"TeamViewer can improve by making the interface more user-friendly. It looks very basic, they can make it more modern and easy to use."
"It needs to have proper authentication. I would like to see in-depth integration with Google and Microsoft products, for example. It would be nice to have a cell phone version as well."
"On occasion, when remote connection process can't connect to a machine, the error messages aren't always helpful to tell you why you can't connect, as the message doesn't help troubleshoot whether it is too slow, too much interference, etc. I usually have to run to another computer and figure out what is going on, then restart it. The diagnostics could be improved."
"The SSO feature of the solution may sometimes not function perfectly…Pricing might be improved for TeamViewer Tensor."
"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."
"The solution could include more AI (Artificial Intelligence)."
TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 84 reviews while TeamViewer Tensor is ranked 9th in Remote Access with 4 reviews. TeamViewer is rated 8.6, while TeamViewer Tensor is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Tensor writes "A user-friendly and stable solution providing remote desktop sharing functionality to its users". TeamViewer is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online, LogMeIn Central and BeyondTrust Remote Support, whereas TeamViewer Tensor is most compared with TeamViewer Pilot, BeyondTrust Remote Support, Parallels Access, LogMeIn Rescue and Splashtop Remote Support. See our TeamViewer vs. TeamViewer Tensor report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
