We use it in our bank.
We have some servers, and more than two users go remotely with them. We prepare with the Microsoft engineer servers that take them and the license for the users when they need them.
We use it in our bank.
We have some servers, and more than two users go remotely with them. We prepare with the Microsoft engineer servers that take them and the license for the users when they need them.
It has generally improved how our organization functions.
The solution is now stable.
The initial setup is simple. It's quick to deploy.
It works well and does what we need it to do.
Sometimes the server stops working, and we don’t know why. Occasionally we’ll get a message to the effect of "There is no remote license."
I’ve been using the solution for about one year.
While we had a problem before, now everything is stable. It’s reliable now. We’ve dealt with our issues and no longer have troubles.
I can’t speak to the scalability. I’ve never attempted to scale. That’s handled by someone else in the company.
Right now, we have 50 licenses available to us. We use the solution quite extensively.
I’ve never dealt with technical support for issues related to the stability problem. I can’t speak to how helpful or responsive they would be. Other team members deal with them. We do have a support contract with Microsoft.
I have dealt with them on Teams on Active Directory and found them to be helpful. I found their help to be excellent.
We already had a license with Microsoft, and therefore, it was natural to use this product as well.
It’s not difficult to set up. It’s pretty straightforward.
The deployment is pretty fast. It only takes about an hour and a half. We only needed to have three people handle the deployment and maintenance.
An engineer worked with us to set up the servers. We have machines joining the domain, and we have workgroup machines.
We handled everything in-house. We didn’t need the help of consultants.
I’m not sure if we have seen an ROI.
I cannot speak to how much the solution costs. My understanding is that it is moderately priced in that it is not cheap or expensive. We ended up getting it when we renewed our license. It’s an extra feature with the broader Microsoft license.
I’m not sure which version of the solution we’re using.
I’d recommend the solution to others. It’s solved problems for us and worked well.
I’d rate the solution nine out of ten.
We have a partnership with Microsoft.
My company uses the capabilities of Microsoft Remote Desktop Services to connect with Windows from home.
I have never faced any issues working with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. You can say that the tool has remote access functionalities that every system or network admin uses. In some case scenarios, we also get the end user to use Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. The tool is simple to use and simple to deploy.
Microsoft improves its UI experience in every upgrade.
In the past, my company had faced some issues related to the stability of the product. The product's stability can be improved.
I have been using Microsoft Remote Desktop Services for more than 10 years. I am an end-user of the tool.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10.
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
I haven't done the product setup process for a long time.
For those who use Microsoft Azure service, the solution is deployed on the cloud model. If someone uses Windows Server, the solution can be deployed on an on-premises or a local cloud model.
Actually, there are many many other products that provide remote access capabilities. If we compare Microsoft Remote Desktop Services with the other products, I would recommend the virtual network console and maybe a communication application that can be used with Linux OS. If you start with Microsoft, Remote Desktop Services is a very good tool.
The remote work concept came into the picture after COVID-19. Before COVID-19, I was a network admin. Many people were using Microsoft Remote Desktop Services for remote access. In my company, if we are at home and want to check if all the backups are taken care of by automated operations and other related activities, we use Microsoft Remote Desktop Services to connect to the Windows Server.
My company uses many Microsoft products, like Office 365, Microsoft teams, MS Office, Excel and SharePoint. Every company uses Microsoft products. All the four companies I have worked at in the past use Microsoft.
I rate the tool an 8 out of 10.
We use it on the customer side. We use the product as remote desktop services.
We've been satisfied with the product overall.
The remote desktop features are great. It allows users to work remotely. We can take a remote session on the server.
It's largely stable.
The solution is easy to implement.
We'd like more granular security control of the desktop services. Right now, we have a third-party solution that does this.
We need to control via group policies. We need to be able to implement these policies in a simpler way in order to control users in a more granular way.
I've used the solution since 2010. I've used it for over ten years.
The solution is mostly stable. I'd rate the stability five out of ten. We are not able to control or protect without group policies. With a better ability to make policies, it will become stable.
I have not attempted to scale the solution. We're using it for on-premises reasons only. All the customers are here.
We do not contact technical support directly. We simply rely on Google and seek out our own answers if needed.
We have used different solutions in the past. We found it was easier to centralize control and maintain better security with it.
For the most part, it is easy to implement. However, the management is dependent on group policies.
How many people you need to deploy the solution depends on the size of the environment required.
I'm not aware of the exact pricing. I work on the implementation side.
We had been working as a partner for Microsoft.
I'd rate the solution five out of ten.
Microsoft needs one centralized console to manage all of its components. That would make it better.
The first use case was related to the development and testing environment. Before COVID, it was also for remote connections for work from home, to have access to a protected environment.
The solution has improved a lot.
It's simple to set up.
It is stable.
The solution can scale according to the hardware available.
The solution isn't as good as the Citrix option.
I used the solution for ten years.
It's a stable, reliable product. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze.
There are some limitations in terms of the the ability to expand. It's scalable according to the hardware limitation or the virtual environment limitation.
I've also used Citrix. I prefer Citrix to Remote Desktop connections. The management and flow are better.
Hyper-V is also challenging Citrix. However, Citrix has a strong reputation still.
The initial setup was not complex at all. It was very straightforward.
The connection for the client is embedded in the system. You just need to configure the servers and credentials.
We did not calculate an ROI, however, it does offer more features than we needed and therefore offers great value for money.
I'm not sure about the licensing. The licensing policies are changing in the Microsoft environment, so I'm not sure how it's licensed at this time.
My understanding is that it is expensive. Even if we negotiate, it depends on the business you have and the volumes you run an issue for.
With the rules changing, the licensing can be complex.
I was a reseller and partner.
I'm not sure which version of the solution I used.
We started using the solution on-premises and then deployed it to the Azure cloud.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. It's simple to deploy. Users just need to negotiate a price and handle tasks around their server license.
The most valuable aspect is it is handy. We just start up the servers, and we can call the remote desktop, and it's connected. And that's it.
The product is stable.
It is easy to set up.
The solution is highly scalable.
The performance depends on connectivity. The refreshing screen rate is based on the internet and the bandwidth. It can therefore be unstable.
It would be nice if they had a portable version. This would make it much better. Sometimes we cannot install it on some machines. We just want to use it once and don't need to actually install it anyway, yet we can't.
I've been using the solution for 20 years.
The stability depends on the connectivity. If there is terrible connectivity, it will be unstable. In general, if the connectivity is there, I would rate it four out of five in terms of stability.
The scalability has been very good.
We have about 20 licensed users on the solution right now.
I've never called technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are.
I'm familiar with TeamViewer and Desktop Anywhere. They are good, however, we are concerned they have issues surrounding security. That's why we prefer this product.
The initial setup is simple. It's not a complex process.
The solution comes in a bundle, which offers a cost-savings to customers.
I'm not sure of the exact price. I don't deal with that directly.
I'm just an end-user.
It's on-prem and we have a server or a cluster to form a group of servers to provide. We are our access from other countries as we have some colleagues working in Britain.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We have a lot of Microsoft services configured for different applications. We use the solution to access them.
Since the tool has a graphical user interface, it's easier for us to access the server. It's easier to connect to someone and explain it to them. It is easy to share and explain the features of the solution.
We face frequent disconnections.
I have been using the solution for the past 4 years.
The product is stable enough. I rate the stability an 8 out of 10.
We are quite a large organization with 14,000 employees. Almost everyone uses the product on a daily basis.
The support team takes a long time to get back to us. The team takes almost 2 days to respond to us. The wait time is longer than that of Azure and AWS’s support teams.
The tool is the only way for us to connect to the servers. I will recommend the tool to others. If an organization has a Microsoft ecosystem, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services is the only out-of-the-box solution available. Installing anything else would be a hassle. Overall, I rate the solution an 8 out of 10.
I use the tool to switch to my company’s Windows desktop from my personal system.
The product saves time. It is convenient to use. It is a smart solution. The security is good.
The stability must be improved.
I rate the product’s stability a six out of ten.
We have a bunch of users.
The installation is easy. It took five to seven minutes. The solution is cloud-based.
We can do the deployment ourselves. We install an application and connect to the server. We must provide our credentials to connect to the tool.
People who want to use the product must do a bit of research before making a decision. We faced compatibility issues since some users were using different operating systems. So, our organization asked us to use Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. Windows is a very common operating system used all over the world. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
We use the solution as a remote desktop. It allows us to access Windows services.
The solution offers good access to desktops remotely. It makes work easier.
The user interface is fine.
It offers reasonable pricing. Microsoft is very reasonable in its approach to cost.
The solution is stable.
It can scale well.
The initial setup is simple.
It offers good centralized security features.
The solution offers many updates. Every week we get updates.
It offers very good functionality.
The solution is not missing any features.
It could offer better security for enterprises. They are not always on top of security.
I've been using the solution for one year.
The solution is stable If the network k is very stable, you won't have issues. I'd rate the stability eight out of ten. We haven't had any issues.
The solution is scalable. It extends well. I'd rate it ten out of ten.
We have about five network and system administrators on the solution. If we increase resources, we may increase usage. It's very easy to increase users as necessary.
We have never used Microsoft technical support.
The initial setup is very straightforward.
The deployment only takes ten minutes.
We simply need the remote server parameters in order to make the connection and finalize the setup.
We only need one technical person to deploy and maintain the product. A system admin could easily manage it.
As long as I have the remote server parameters, I can handle the setup myself.
We do have to pay a licensing fee. The pricing is not too expensive. It's very reasonable.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd recommend the solution. Microsoft of very reliable, and its remote desktop is great. However, there needs to be more security.