The initial setup is complex.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward. 

If it is deployed from scratch, the documentation is pretty straightforward. We just followed the steps and we were able to do it. There were no unexpected bugs or any other issues we faced. Everything was quite straightforward.

I'd rate the solution four out of five in terms of the initial setup. 

Maintenance was taken care. Maintenance was good there. It doesn't need any more effort. What we used was the latest one, a stable version, and since we were dealing with a corporate organization, we wanted stable versions to be always tested. 

While the process does seem to be straightforward, I have not personally implemented the solution.

The initial setup of Aqua Security is simple if you know some helm charts work.

There were some challenges with the initial setup.

The initial setup was straightforward. Not much configuration was needed. It didn't take us a long time to set it up and we got support from them for specific questions. It was done in about half a day.

Since ours is not a complex use case, we didn't have a particular strategy for the setup. We don't have a complex environment. We did it ourselves. It's very easy to implement.

Initially, we had some issues. There were problems with Microsoft and AI. In the latest Aqua release, we did a multi-cloud deployment, and we coordinated the cloud and the migration. 

There are a couple of components to contend with. For example, there's the Aqua gateway. It's fine to work with. However, it's hard to have control. 

It's not overly complex. It just really depends on the environment. Therefore, it could be easy, or a little more complicated. 

Mostly, my experience was pretty good. I'd rate it a 4.5 out of five in terms of ease of setup.

The initial setup was easy.

The initial setup was very straightforward.

We were able to deploy, test, and roll it out in a short amount of time. The Aqua Security team was really supportive and were able to address our unique needs right away. They were able to address certain issues that showed up as bugs in their code but they were resolved really fast. They had really great customer service.

The setup was straightforward compared to their competitors, whose setup failed. The Aqua Security setup went smoothly and we were surprised that it actually went off without any issues. The installation instructions they had provided were straightforward and we didn't require much assistance for the initial rollout. The way they packaged it, it was straightforward to install and manage at the same time. It wasn't complex at all.

The initial setup is a little bit complex for an on-premises deployment. We needed to have many specialized people on Kubernetes to maintain this deployment and keep it up to date. It is a little bit complex because of Kubernetes, not because of Aqua itself, but Aqua have some features to facilitate the deployment.

You need three or four people for the deployment. For a small environment, deployment would take two to three hours. For larger environments, it would take longer than that. 

This is an easy solution to maintain. The main thing is to maintain the databases.

The setup was a little complex but not too complicated. The difficulty level lies somewhere in the middle between easy and hard.

Setup was initially complex before the 3.9 version. We were on version 3.7 and it has been a challenge compared to version 3.11. Deployment was done once or twice in a week.

We are using an in-house regiment. For deployment, we are using automation.

The initial setup was straightforward. We spent around 12 days on the planning during our POC. Planning, testing, and mitigation took around 10-12 days.

The initial setup was straightforward. The first time you deploy you, you need support but after that, it's easy to understand the documentation that they provide. After two or three times it's easy. 

It takes around one week to get all of the environments in place but to do a PoC is only two days.