360logica Regression Testing Services vs DXC Testing and Digital Assurance comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
25
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
71
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Regression testing is a type of software testing used to determine whether new problems are the result of software changes. Before applying a change, a program is tested. After a change is applied, the program is retested in selected areas to detect whether the change created new bugs or issues, or if the actual change achieved its intended purpose.

Regression testing ensures that any change in the source code or program doesn’t affect the existing features of the software application. It is basically selecting test cases that are fully or partially executed before. So, basically this ensures with every new change or introduction of new codes, the old code still works.

DXC Testing and Digital Assurance is designed to deliver faster, better and cost-effective solutions by featuring comprehensive testing services designed to provide a 360 degree view of your application quality including functionality, complexity, performance, and security.

360logica Regression Testing Services is ranked 52nd in Application Testing Services while DXC Testing and Digital Assurance is ranked 22nd in Application Testing Services. 360logica Regression Testing Services is rated 0.0, while DXC Testing and Digital Assurance is rated 0.0. On the other hand, 360logica Regression Testing Services is most compared with , whereas DXC Testing and Digital Assurance is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.