• Home
  • a1qa Software Regression Testing Services vs. QA Madness Manual Testing

QA Madness Manual Testing vs a1qa Software Regression Testing Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
59th
out of 68 in Application Testing Services
Views
27
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
43rd
out of 68 in Application Testing Services
Views
33
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
a1qa
Video Not Available
QA Madness
Overview

Our long-running experience in providing regression testing services allows us to view your project from multiple perspectives, taking what works best out of our extensive toolsets and skills.

For over 10 years, QA Madness has been providing testing services to businesses around the world, and we’re ready to help you grow your business. With a wide range of QA testing services and solutions completed by a team of quality assurance experts, you’re making the right decision when you choose QA Madness for your application testing needs.

Source: Why QA Madness ? - Software outsource testing service QA Madness Software testing company

Sample Customers
adidas, forexclub, turkcell, intercall, pearson, VELCOM, GLOBAL MONEY, AirG, expedia
DevPocket, Ewave, Fight Camp, Above The Fray

a1qa Software Regression Testing Services is ranked 59th in Application Testing Services while QA Madness Manual Testing is ranked 43rd in Application Testing Services. a1qa Software Regression Testing Services is rated 0.0, while QA Madness Manual Testing is rated 0.0. On the other hand, a1qa Software Regression Testing Services is most compared with , whereas QA Madness Manual Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.