Compare Achronix Speedster7t vs. QuickLogic FPGA

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
4th
out of 6 in Enterprise FPGA
Views
30
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 6 in Enterprise FPGA
Views
16
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
QuickLogic
Video Not Available
Overview

Acting like a superhighway network running over the FPGA programmable-logic fabric, the Speedster7t NoC supports high-bandwidth communication between interfaces and custom acceleration functions in the programmable-logic fabric. ... To learn more, visit Network on Chip.

QuickLogic SRAM FPGA’s are suitable for battery backed, low power reconfigurable applications. QuickLogic provides SRAM FPGA s designed specifically for lowest system power. Our SRAM family (PolarPro 3/3E) are perfect for battery backed applications
requiring a level of flexibility or re-programmability.

QuickLogic Low Power SRAM FPGAs offer:
-Ultra-low powe
-Reprogrammable
-Low cost

Offer
Learn more about Achronix Speedster7t
Learn more about QuickLogic FPGA
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Al Speech, Consilient Technologies, DSP Concepts, Nuance, Retune DSP, Analog Devices, Bosch, Nordic, Amkor, GLOBALFOUNDRIES

Achronix Speedster7t is ranked 4th in Enterprise FPGA while QuickLogic FPGA is ranked 5th in Enterprise FPGA. Achronix Speedster7t is rated 0.0, while QuickLogic FPGA is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Achronix Speedster7t is most compared with , whereas QuickLogic FPGA is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise FPGA vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise FPGA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.