Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] vs Qlik Compose comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Qlik Logo
2,050 views|1,547 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Qlik Compose based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Pros →

"I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product.""Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive.""There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms.""The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.""The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.""One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions.""As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good.""I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

More Qlik Compose Pros →

Cons
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."

More Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] Cons →

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails.""There could be more customization options.""There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process.""There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help.""It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it.""My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working.""Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better.""When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • "While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
  • More Qlik Compose Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cubes… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
    Top Answer:While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Data Integration
    20th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,050
    Comparisons
    1,547
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    460
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pervasive Data Integrator, PDI
    Compose, Attunity Compose
    Learn More
    Overview
    Pervasive's Data Integrator platform is a robust enterprise data integration software solution that enables you to quickly build powerful and frictionless connections between any kind of data source and application.

    Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

    Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

    Sample Customers
    Pediatrix Medical Group
    Poly-Wood
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Integration while Qlik Compose is ranked 20th in Data Integration with 12 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Qlik Compose is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Compose writes "Easy matching and reconciliation of data". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Qlik Compose is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Talend Open Studio, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), SSIS and Azure Data Factory.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.