• Home
  • ActivNetworks BoostEdge vs. Barracuda Load Balancer ADC

ActivNetworks BoostEdge vs Barracuda Load Balancer ADC comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Featured Review
    Use ActivNetworks BoostEdge?
    AnisKazi
    Cost-effective but lacking features and integration
    Quotes From Members
    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
    Here are some excerpts of what they said:
    Pricing and Cost Advice
    Information Not Available
  • "Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."

    • More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Emerging Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
    Top Answer:The price is very good, and it's not very expensive.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Load Ba...
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is reasonable. It costs approximately 200 million. So the price is very good, and it's not very expensive, because it's just basic WAF, but the Load Balancer is good.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC?
    Top Answer:The quality of the solution's performance could be improved. For example, the solution's performance is high because of CPU usage when the application is in refresh mode for more than 30 seconds… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    14th
    out of 24 in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    Views
    622
    Comparisons
    531
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    BoostEdge
    Barracuda Load Balancer
    Learn More
    ActivNetworks
    Barracuda Networks
    Overview
    BoostEdge Atlas is an ADC (Application Delivery Controller) which makes applications run faster, decreases bandwidth needs, ensures application availability, protects servers and data and every corporate application deployment.
    Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
    Sample Customers
    Alcatel Lucent, Ark-Les, Bouygues Telecom, Ciblex, Rio Tinto
    Fenwal Blood Technologies
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization9%
    Retailer7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%

    ActivNetworks BoostEdge doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is ranked 14th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 3 reviews. ActivNetworks BoostEdge is rated 0.0, while Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC writes "Cost-effective but lacking features and integration". ActivNetworks BoostEdge is most compared with , whereas Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Fortinet FortiADC, Citrix NetScaler, Kemp LoadMaster and HAProxy.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.