We performed a comparison between ActivTrack and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."ActivTrack has a range of features, including a detailed dashboard, alert monitoring, screenshots, and report generation. Overall, ActivTrak has worked as advertised, and we're happy. Our favorite feature is probably the alerts. ActivTrack warns employees when they break the rules, which helps us keep staff in check."
"IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics's most important feature is its ease of use."
"I have found IBM QRadar to be scalable."
"Improved our organization's TCO."
"The interface is good."
"Senses, tracks, and links significant incidents and threats."
"IBM QRadar is great help from its security event monitoring to data center and NOC troubleshooting of issues hard for other departments to spot."
"It has very rich functionality."
"QRadar UBA's most valuable feature is the risk rating of users depending on their behavior."
"I prefer an on-prem deployment, but ActivTrak currently doesn't offer this. It would address privacy concerns that come up for end-users. I would also love it if monitoring could be expanded to company mobile phones. This will enable us to track and maintain productivity on devices like that."
"It's resource-intensive."
"The Indian tech support is not helpful."
"I don't look at only the features and benefits; I also look at the price. It is a bit expensive when compared with other solutions. It is expensive for specific deployment topologies, and the decision-makers go for alternatives like ArcSight. It should also have more AI features or capabilities for better threat intelligence. The more it uses machine learning, the better would be the dashboard, analytics, and other things."
"From a functionality point of view there are issues sometimes."
"The whole process for support is something that needs to be improved."
"I would like for Yara to be supported by all components."
"The solution can be improved by lowering the cost and bettering their technical support."
"They should introduce some automation into the product."
Earn 20 points
ActivTrack is ranked 25th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. ActivTrack is rated 9.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActivTrack writes "It makes employees more conscious of what they're do on the clock, helping us to deliver better services to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". ActivTrack is most compared with , whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.