• Home
  • ADAM Smart Content Hub [EOL] vs. inRiver

ADAM Smart Content Hub [EOL] vs inRiver comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Digital Asset Management
1st
out of 10 in Product Information Management (PIM)
Views
58
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
ADAM Software
InRiver
Overview
ADAM Digital Asset Management helps enterprises deliver engaging customer experiences faster. Digital asset librarians, marketers, brand managers and creatives can manage images, videos, documents and other assets across different stages of content lifecycles. Improve asset reuse and global brand consistency, and publish new marketing materials and campaigns more quickly.

The original Product Experience Management platform. Provide perfect product information and speed time to market.

Sample Customers
Stanley, Square Enix, DSM, European Parliament, Ubisoft, Komatsu
Intersport Sverige AB, Krusell International AB, Office Depot, Worth, ITW, Mayline Company LLC, Power Products LLC, SAIL, BMW Group, Beijer Electronics, Consortio Fashion Group, Draka Kabel Sverige

ADAM Smart Content Hub [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Digital Asset Management while inRiver is ranked 1st in Product Information Management (PIM). ADAM Smart Content Hub [EOL] is rated 0.0, while inRiver is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ADAM Smart Content Hub [EOL] is most compared with , whereas inRiver is most compared with SAP Hybris PCM, Informatica PIM and Stibo STEP MDM.

We monitor all Digital Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.