MartinMonteiroSr Domain Specialist at a healthcare company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We are on the Flex licenses."
"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."
"The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."
"We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."
"I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen."
"We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."
"We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."
"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."
Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager (EAM) is a robust MOF-compliant knowledge repository solution for organizing, integrating and analyzing information about the key architecture elements of an enterprise. Adaptive EAM captures and monitors the full scope of enterprise architecture initiatives, enabling performance monitoring and enterprise governance on a holistic scale.
Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is ranked 30th in Architecture Management while MID Innovator is ranked 20th in Architecture Management. Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is rated 0.0, while MID Innovator is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adaptive Enterprise Architecture Manager is most compared with , whereas MID Innovator is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Camunda Platform.
See our list of best Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.