We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Adobe AIR vs. Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe AIR Logo
229 views|208 comparisons
Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 Logo
14 views|7 comparisons
Ranking
Views
229
Comparisons
208
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
13th
Views
14
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Enterprise Web 2.0
Learn More
Overview

The Adobe AIR runtime enables developers to package the same code into native apps for Windows and Mac OS desktops as well as iPhone, iPad, Kindle Fire, Nook Tablet, and other Android™ devices, reaching the mobile app stores for over 500 million devices. 

The Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform has been used to modernize hundreds of client/server applications. It embraces open standards, is extensible and enables re-use. Furthermore, the Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 platform enables customers to develop distributed, interactive, rich applications that require outstanding reliability and performance, such as those in financial trading, order management, product configuration, and business-to-business self-service.
Offer
Learn more about Adobe AIR
Learn more about Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0
Sample Customers
France T_l_visions
Samsung, LG, Oracle, MetLife, Toyota, Hyundai, Sungard, Patagonia, Pepsico

Adobe AIR is ranked 6th in .NET Development Services while Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 is ranked 13th in .NET Development Services. Adobe AIR is rated 0.0, while Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Adobe AIR is most compared with Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight, whereas Nexaweb Enterprise Web 2.0 is most compared with .

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.