Adobe Captivate vs OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."
  • More Adobe Captivate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Publishing Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T
    Top Answer:There is no Captivate subscription in India, whereas US and other markets have. It is cheaper than its competitors.
    Top Answer:The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old. It needs to improve how it works. Also, new features are missing too. The latest version is… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    113
    Comparisons
    63
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    357
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Publishing Software
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Captivate
    EMC Document Sciences xPression
    Learn More
    Overview
    Adobe Captivate software reimagines the way interactive eLearning is created for a multi-device world. Develop any-screen mobile learning without programming using all-new responsive authoring.
    OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition helps utomates the generation of highly customized and personalized multichannel customer communications. With xPression, you can replace multiple document generation systems to reduce costs, streamline processes, and improve customer experience. It consolidate multiple single purpose and disparate systems onto a single flexible platform for all types of vital business communications. OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition automates the generation of millions of documents per hour, while supporting thousands of concurrent users, to increase operational efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure accuracy. It leverage familiar tools from Microsoft and Adobe to generate personalized and customized correspondence, contracts, statements, and marketing materials on-demand, interactively, and in high-volume batch and it uses industry standards such as Java, XML and Web Services to integrate with various operating systems, application servers, databases, and other existing enterprise systems.
    Sample Customers
    GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo
    Aksigorta, EmblemHealth, Independence Blue Cross, Sammons Financial Group, State Department of Labor, American Medical Security

    Adobe Captivate is ranked 2nd in Publishing Software with 4 reviews while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Publishing Software. Adobe Captivate is rated 8.0, while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Adobe Captivate writes "Enables you to create many complex E-learnings ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] writes "Integration with Adobe Suite was great, but there were too many limitations based on the composition tools used". Adobe Captivate is most compared with Pluralsight, iSpring Suite, FrameMaker and Nitro Pro, whereas OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is most compared with QuarkXPress.

    See our list of best Publishing Software vendors.

    We monitor all Publishing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.