Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] vs Xamarin Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and Xamarin Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Mobile Development Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable.""I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."

More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pros →

"It usually saves time for application development. We write once and the code works everywhere.""The solution is easy to understand and has banking integrated. The shorter development time, the bugging and as well as availability of a lot of documentation on the web. Also the native integration is easy.""The ability to share a platform-agnostic common core, or business logic, enables a mobile developer to write code for all targeted mobile platforms, independent of the individual developer's specialization in iOS, Android, or Windows. This helps not only during development but also enables easier maintenance of deployed apps, since bug fixes or feature additions can be often made in the platform-agnostic layer.""The best part while using the Xamarin Platform is a cross-platform application. We could execute iOS and Android while writing a single line of code.""The technical support is very good and it's close to native.""Xamarin Platform enables you to use a single code language. This is beneficial for Android, iOS, and Windows platforms, so they can be developed over application or built over application.""Cross-platform development saves time and provides consistencies.""Their leadership is exceptional at both listening to the customer base and delivering innovative, best-in-class products."

More Xamarin Platform Pros →

Cons
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution.""Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."

More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Cons →

"We'd like to have some chat support functionality.""Xamarin Platform lacks in app size.""All Xamarin library issues need to be taken care of as a top priority.""I feel that the Android AppCompat library creates a lot of issues. A lot of development time is often wasted solving these issues.""There are compatibility issues between versions of various Xamarin components.""The Xamarin.Forms could improve.""Needs to improve the customization of its screens.""Xamarin Platform can improve by making the enterprise documentation better. There's a lot of basic documentation of how to do many of the functions of the solution, but there's not much enterprise-level documentation."

More Xamarin Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In most cases, it is sufficient to have free/community license. But if you plan to seriously develop production-level, highly polished apps, you need to use Xamarin.Profiler and the professional or enterprise license."
  • "For personal use, the Community Edition is free."
  • "This is a free product, so there is zero investment on licenses and IDE."
  • "Xamarin is available under several licensing arrangements. Each developer needs one license at least. All features, especially the Profiler, unlock only with the highest tier."
  • "It saved a lot of time and resources needed to develop a cross platform mobile app."
  • "Xamarin is free, or comes with Visual Studio. Therefore, it is very profitable."
  • "The price of the Xamarin Platform is not expensive. However, the price of the solution depends on the application that is made. For example, if you have small applications, it's different from large or enterprise applications."
  • "There's no licensing cost for Xamarin."
  • More Xamarin Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool.
    Top Answer:The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution.
    Top Answer:It's the best CMS, and if price is not a factor, you can go for it without thinking about other products. I would rate Adobe Experience Manager Mobile at eight on a scale from one to ten.
    Top Answer:The platform is easy to learn as many tutorials are available on YouTube.
    Top Answer:Regarding improvements, there are still some limitations with Xamarin, particularly regarding access to core functionality in Android and iOS. When developers need to utilize certain core features of… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Mobile Development Platforms
    Views
    1,487
    Comparisons
    1,029
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adobe Experience Manager Mobile lets you do it all. Build, manage, and deliver beautiful apps with business impact.

    Xamarin is an open-source platform for developing modern and performant applications for iOS, Android, and Windows using.NET. Xamarin is an abstraction layer that manages how shared code is communicated to the platform's underlying code. Xamarin is for developers with the two following goals:

    • Cross-platform sharing of code, tests, and business logic.

    • Writing cross-platform apps in C# with Visual Studio.

    Xamarin allows developers to share an average of 90% of their program across platforms. This enables programmers to achieve native performance, look, and feel on each platform while writing all of their business logic in a single language (or reusing existing application code).

    Xamarin applications can be created on a PC or a Mac and compiled into native application packages, such as an .apk file for Android or an .ipa file for iOS.

    Xamarin Platform Features

    Xamarin Platform has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Complete binding for the supporting SDKs: Xamarin includes bindings for almost all of the underlying platform SDKs in iOS and Android.
    • Java, C, Objective-C, C, C++ Interop: Xamarin gives you the ability to use a variety of third-party code by providing tools for directly invoking Objective-C, Java, C, and C++ libraries.
    • Modern language constructs: Xamarin applications are written in C#, a modern language with many capabilities that Objective-C and Java do not have, like lambdas, LINQ, parallel programming, generics, and more.
    • Strong base class library (BCL): Xamarin apps use the .NET BCL, a large collection of classes with streamlined features, like powerful XML, database, serialization, IO, string, and networking support, among others.

    Xamarin Platform Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing the Xamarin Platform. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Native UIs and APIs: Xamarin delivers comprehensive access to each platform's native SDK and UI controls, projecting the entire native API of each device into C#. Therefore, the apps you develop are native instead of write-once/run-anywhere programs that look alien on every platform. Xamarin provides you access to all of the capabilities that distinguish each platform.
    • Share code between platforms: With Xamarin, you can share all code across platforms while providing a native user interface tailored to each individual device. With Xamarin, you can execute the same C# code on iOS, Android, and Windows Phone. With Xamarin, your software is compiled to a native binary rather than being interpreted, in contrast to other cross-platform frameworks. Even in the most demanding situations, native compilation provides users with excellent app performance. Xamarin provides responsive, multi-user input and feedback, fluid scrolling, sophisticated graphics and animations, complicated data visualization, and realistic high frame rates for games.
    • Code with C#: Write shorter, more concise, and more maintainable code by leveraging advanced language features, such as Language Integrated Query (LINQ), delegates, lambdas, events, garbage collection, and many other features. With Xamarin's fully extensible platform, you can include libraries written in C, Objective-C, C++, or Java. In C#, you have access to the entire native ecosystem of components and libraries.

    Sample Customers
    MasterCard, Nedbank, Motorola, Craftsman
    Cinemark, MixRadio, Sqor Sports, Storyo, JetBlue, The World Bank, Cr_dito Agrcola, Applied Research Associates
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Music Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Mobile Development Platforms
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Xamarin Platform is ranked 6th in Mobile Development Platforms with 39 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Xamarin Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Xamarin Platform writes "It's about to be retired and replaced with an inferior product, but offers excellent cross-platform development capabilities". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Xamarin Platform is most compared with Appium, Ionic, OutSystems, Apple Xcode and Mendix.

    See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.