Compare Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs. Bitglass

Akamai Enterprise Application Access is ranked unranked in Access Management while Bitglass is ranked 10th in Cloud Access Security Brokers. Akamai Enterprise Application Access is rated 0, while Bitglass is rated 0. On the other hand, Akamai Enterprise Application Access is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Forcepoint CASB and Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks , whereas Bitglass is most compared with Netskope CASB, Microsoft Cloud App Security and MVision Cloud.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Access Management
Views
2,057
Comparisons
1,565
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
SohaBitglass Next-Gen CSG
Learn
Akamai
Bitglass
Overview

Soha Cloud creates a “cloud perimeter” to protect an organization’s infrastructure from Internet threats, including distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks and botnets. Soha Cloud also minimizes a customer’s attack surface, hides applications from public exposure and grants authenticated users micro-granular access to specific applications. Unlike stand-alone, legacy security tools and network access methods, Soha Cloud integrates data path protection, identity access, application security and management visibility into a single solution to create a cloud perimeter between a user organization’s infrastructure and the Internet.

The Bitglass OmniTM multi-protocol proxy architecture ensures that all data, whether accessed from a managed or unmanaged device, is subject to the visibility and control required by the organization, while simultaneously preserving employee privacy across personal applications. Omni Agentless, Bitglass’ reverse proxy capability, leverages patent pending AJAX-VM technology to ensure application resilience. Competitive CASBs either rely entirely on cumbersome agent-based forward proxy solutions, or suffer from breakages and downtime as cloud providers update and change their applications.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai Enterprise Application Access
Learn more about Bitglass
Sample Customers
Bugcrowd, InPowered, Spirent CommunicationsUNC-Charlotte
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Okta, Microsoft and others in Access Management. Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.