We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and CA App Synthetic Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while CA App Synthetic Monitor is ranked 47th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while CA App Synthetic Monitor is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA App Synthetic Monitor writes "A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Grafana, Datadog and AppDynamics, whereas CA App Synthetic Monitor is most compared with AppDynamics and Azure Monitor. See our Akamai mPulse vs. CA App Synthetic Monitor report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.