Akamai mPulse vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Akamai Logo
1,057 views|850 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
468 views|379 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Akamai mPulse vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great.""The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."

More Akamai mPulse Pros →

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed.""The stability has been very good over the years."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Pros →

Cons
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there.""In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."

More Akamai mPulse Cons →

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective.""Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great.
Top Answer:The end-to-end distributor tracing needs some work because the connectivity from the user to the backend wasn't there. Akamai mPulse was not able to deliver on our requirements regarding observation… more »
Top Answer:The primary use case of mPulse is for real-time user monitoring. Our use case was to observe the entire platform from the user all the way to the backend system and that's what it did. It's all in the… more »
Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
Views
1,057
Comparisons
850
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
457
Rating
5.0
Views
468
Comparisons
379
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOASTA mPulse
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Overview

Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that gives performance engineers, administrators, and developers the ability to effortlessly visualize website functionality issues and identify ways to improve processes that conventional testing protocols do not find. mPulse gives users usable scenarios to better understand how processes such as user interactions, visual progress, and third-party resources may be disrupting the overall user experience and application delivery.

mPulse enables users to take a deep dive into the specific performance issues and complete comprehensive error analyses, to thoroughly understand the effect on critical user interactions such as conversions, page views, and more.

mPulse gathers and delivers data on an organization's website’s performance and metrics on user web browsing experiences. The mPulse feature “Boomerang” is a JavaScript Library that monitors the website page load time. Boomerang has a unique plugin architecture and works with all websites. The Boomerang feature is embedded on each page of an organization's website.

mPulse works seamlessly with Akamai solution Ion, so the RUM data can be instantly gathered once the Luna Control Center has been activated. Ion instantly attaches Boomerang to the organization’s web properties; there is no need to change the website code.

Akamai mPulse Benefits

  • Third-party monitoring: mPulse enables users to effortlessly monitor and visualize the effect that third-party vendors, resources, and scripts may have on the organization’s web properties.

  • Real-time intuitions: RUM data is continually being gathered, so users are able to instantly experience changes in user performance during every critical event. Users are able to respond immediately and make corrections or amendments as needed. Additionally, mPulse integrates effectively with other third-party notification solutions, such as Slack, PagerDuty, and webhook API support.

  • Framework integrations: mPulse integrates with many of today’s popular single-page application (SPA) frameworks, such as React.js, Backbone.js, Angular.js, Ember.js, and even some custom frameworks. mPulse has the ability to also be seamlessly integrated in Non-SPA websites.

  • Intuitive feedback: mPulse gathers data and creates workable solutions so users have a better understanding of how objects, images, or even entire pages are affecting user behavior. Users can gather numerous metrics (custom or advanced) to achieve a better, more complete understanding of ways to improve the user experience with the application or website.

  • Custom metrics and timers: With mPulse, users can effortlessly create custom timers to discover important performance sessions unique to the application. The mPulse dashboard allows users to set up trackers for numerous metrics, such as:

    • First image load time
    • Sidebar load time
    • Page load times
    • Third-party resource content load time

  • mPulse Beacon API: This valuable benefit allows users to send custom metrics from mobile and web applications to mPulse. This gives mPulse greater flexibility and usability to frameworks and platforms that can make HTTP calls. Representational State Transfer (REST) interface is included and is able to be used by any web application using any language running on the platform. There is also a Beacon API library for JavaScript. This option is available from the dashboard by creating a new application and an API key.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
Nordstrom, Gatwick, DirecTV, MSN, SquareSpace, SAP, Lenovo, Hallmark, myspace, Intuit, Kentucky Derby, Toys "R" Us, Netflix, Newsweek, The Washington Post, Lowe's, Nike, REI, Apple, Sears, Verizon, Wendy's, Huawei
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm25%
Computer Software Company12%
Retailer11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Large Enterprise86%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Akamai mPulse vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai mPulse vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Grafana, Datadog and AppDynamics, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics and Dynatrace. See our Akamai mPulse vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.