Compare Akamai Web Application Protector vs. Signal Sciences

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
582
Comparisons
508
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,343
Comparisons
1,525
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF, Signal Sciences RASP
Learn More
Fastly
Video Not Available
Overview

With limited security expertise, protecting your web applications is a daunting task. Web Application Protector provides automated web application firewall (WAF) and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) protection that’s designed to offload the complexity associated with a traditional WAF. Easy to deploy and manage, Web Application Protector is backed by the scale and reliability of the Akamai Intelligent Edge Platform ― so you worry less about threats and focus more on growing your business.

Signal Sciences' next-gen web application firewall (WAF) and runtime application self protection (RASP) increase security and maintain reliability without sacrificing velocity - all at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Offer
Learn more about Akamai Web Application Protector
Learn more about Signal Sciences
Sample Customers
Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet
Chef, Adobe, Datadog, Etsy, GrubHub, Vimeo, SendGrid, Under Armour, Duo, AppNexus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Amazon, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Akamai Web Application Protector is ranked 30th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Signal Sciences is ranked 24th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Akamai Web Application Protector is rated 0.0, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Akamai Web Application Protector is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender and AWS WAF, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Sqreen and Imperva Web Application Firewall.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.