Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Cloud Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
766 views|636 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
1,479 views|1,151 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Inspector and Tenable Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option.""The vulnerability discovery is valuable, and they also rank those vulnerabilities for you. So, you could rapidly attack some of the higher, severe vulnerabilities as they pop up, if they do pop up.""The automated vulnerability detection aspect is most valuable.""The findings dashboards are neat and easy to understand, offering clear demarcations for different types of findings and detailed insights into specific vulnerabilities and their associated instances. It is not a place where everything is dumped together. It offers an easy-to-understand layout."

More Amazon Inspector Pros →

"The solution’s vulnerability management feature has helped us identify and mitigate risks well.""The product's visibility and remediation work fine for me.""The key benefit lies in having the largest and most up-to-date database. When it comes to using any Tenable product, it excels in finding vulnerabilities and providing analytics.""If you have multi-cloud tenancy using AWS and Azure, you can have a single dashboard where you can onboard all the cloud infrastructure and have visibility into it.""The tool alerts us on depreciating performance or deficiencies of our web application. It helps us react on time.""Ermetic can provide super visibility for our cloud environment (we are using AWS)."

More Tenable Cloud Security Pros →

Cons
"There isn't too much to improve right now. Scanning on demand or as a part of the pipeline versus a post pipeline solution would be good, but it is not a deal breaker by any means.""One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful.""It has a limited scope. So, AWS Inspector primarily focuses on the security of the EC2 instance. So, if your architecture includes other AWS services, then you may need to use additional tools for your comprehensive security assessment. So that is one con. Another is, like, we have a dependency on agents.""There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

More Amazon Inspector Cons →

"I do think there might be room for more integrations. This could allow for further customization and flexibility, essentially offering different functionality options to accommodate various budgets.""There is a need for the support team to improve their response time since it is one of the areas where the product's technical team has certain shortcomings.""If Tenable Cloud Security offers a complete Cnapp solution with CWP, CIEM, and Waap security, it will be able to compete with other competitors.""I didn't find anything that wasn't useful or needed to be added.""The product must provide more features.""Ermetic needs to improve its security scanning. I would like to see more dynamic graphical forms."

More Tenable Cloud Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."
  • "It's priced according to market standards for its services."
  • "The pricing is very transparent and clear."
  • More Amazon Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The tool's pricing is fair."
  • "There is a need to opt for a subscription-based pricing model to use Tenable Cloud Security. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
  • More Tenable Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is very transparent and clear, so I don't have any challenges with it. It's good.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected. Right now, it's not as comprehensive as some of the third-party… more »
    Top Answer:The solution’s vulnerability management feature has helped us identify and mitigate risks well.
    Top Answer:The product must provide more features. It must integrate with AI. The reporting features are bad. The reports do not have detailed information. We cannot do CI/CD with the tool.
    Top Answer:The use cases attached to Tenable Cloud Security include compliance verifications for the cloud environment.
    Ranking
    27th
    Views
    766
    Comparisons
    636
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    769
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    1,479
    Comparisons
    1,151
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ermetic
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity. These findings can be reviewed directly or as part of detailed assessment reports which are available via the Amazon Inspector console or API.

    Amazon Inspector security assessments help you check for unintended network accessibility of your Amazon EC2 instances and for vulnerabilities on those EC2 instances. Amazon Inspector assessments are offered to you as pre-defined rules packages mapped to common security best practices and vulnerability definitions. Examples of built-in rules include checking for access to your EC2 instances from the internet, remote root login being enabled, or vulnerable software versions installed. These rules are regularly updated by AWS security researchers.

    Take control of your cloud security program with Tenable Cloud Security (formerly Tenable.cs) low-impact cloud agentless scanning, automated threat detection and risk prioritization. Developed by the leader in vulnerability management, Tenable Cloud Security enables security teams to continuously assess the security posture of cloud environments, offering full visibility across multi-cloud environments and helping you prioritize efforts based on business risk.

    Sample Customers
    betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Insurance Company8%
    Educational Organization6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon Inspector is ranked 27th in Vulnerability Management with 4 reviews while Tenable Cloud Security is ranked 15th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 6 reviews. Amazon Inspector is rated 7.8, while Tenable Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Inspector writes "Primarily focuses on security of EC2 instances, provides point-in-time assessments rather than real time protection but provides automated vulnerability detection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Cloud Security writes "Provides excellent features and helps identify and mitigate risks". Amazon Inspector is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Tenable Nessus, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Tenable Lumin and Microsoft Secure Score, whereas Tenable Cloud Security is most compared with Wiz, Orca Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Tenable Security Center.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.