Compare Amazon MCS vs. Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
77
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
188
Comparisons
163
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Amazon Managed Apache Cassandra Service
Learn More
Overview

With Amazon MCS, you can run your Cassandra workloads on AWS using the same Cassandra application code and developer tools that you use today. Amazon MCS implements the Apache Cassandra version 3.11 CQL API, allowing you to use the code and drivers that you already have in your applications. Updating your application is as easy as changing the endpoint to the one in the Amazon MCS service table.

Amazon MCS provides consistent single-digit-millisecond read and write performance at any scale, so you can build applications with low latency to provide a smooth user experience. You have visibility into how your application is performing using Amazon CloudWatch.

A scale-out, low latency key-value database service including support for JSON and Table data types. Built-in high availability, transactions, parallel query, and more.

Offer
Learn more about Amazon MCS
Learn more about Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud
Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Airbus

Amazon MCS is ranked 8th in Managed NoSQL Databases while Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud is ranked 7th in Managed NoSQL Databases. Amazon MCS is rated 0.0, while Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Amazon MCS is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, whereas Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and Amazon Timestream.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.