Amazon QLDB vs ScyllaDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
277 views|196 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ScyllaDB Logo
2,519 views|1,552 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Balasubramanyam Kamarapu
Pranv Kumar
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product enables the users to query results faster."

More Amazon QLDB Pros →

"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure.""The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."

More ScyllaDB Pros →

Cons
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."

More Amazon QLDB Cons →

"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better.""The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."

More ScyllaDB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is not expensive."
  • More Amazon QLDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."
  • More ScyllaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product enables the users to query results faster.
    Top Answer:The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.
    Top Answer:The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively.
    Top Answer:I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive.
    Top Answer:It has just been a month or so for me with Scylla. The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved. Improvement of documentation is needed considering that I work… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    277
    Comparisons
    196
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,519
    Comparisons
    1,552
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 36% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Aerospike Database 7 logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Amazon Quantum Ledger Database
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon QLDB is a fully managed ledger database that provides a transparent, immutable, and cryptographically verifiable transaction log ‎owned by a central trusted authority. Amazon QLDB tracks each and every application data change and maintains a complete and verifiable history of changes over time.

    ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential​

    ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

    The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

    ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

    Sample Customers
    accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant
    IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Educational Organization7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Amazon QLDB is most compared with MongoDB, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Aerospike Database 7.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.