We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The product enables the users to query results faster."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
Amazon QLDB is ranked 11th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Amazon QLDB is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon QLDB writes "A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Amazon QLDB is most compared with MongoDB, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.