We performed a comparison between Amazon SageMaker and TIBCO Data Science based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Microsoft, Alteryx and others in Data Science Platforms."The solution is easy to scale...The documentation and online community support have been sufficient for us so far."
"We were able to use the product to automate processes."
"The product aggregates everything we need to build and deploy machine learning models in one place."
"The Autopilot feature is really good because it's helpful for people who don't have much experience with coding or data pipelines. When we suggest SageMaker to clients, they don't have to go through all the steps manually. They can leverage Autopilot to choose variables, run experiments, and monitor costs. The results are also pretty accurate."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service."
"The tool has made client management easier where patients need to upload their health records and we can use the tool to understand details on treatment date, amount, etc."
"The superb thing that SageMaker brings is that it wraps everything well. It's got the deployment, the whole framework."
"We've had no problems with SageMaker's stability."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of setting up visualizations."
"We like the way we can drill down into each report to get back data on each project. From the portfolio level, I can see what is happening on it. That is a really important feature. I can look at indirect costs, for example, which are hitting each CIO portfolio. It's good to be able to see actual resources in terms of time as well as cost."
"The idea that you don't have to generate reports each day but they are sent automatically is great."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Creating notebook instances for multiple users is pretty expensive in Amazon SageMaker."
"Lacking in some machine learning pipelines."
"I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox."
"The training modules could be enhanced. We had to take in-person training to fully understand SageMaker, and while the trainers were great, I think more comprehensive online modules would be helpful."
"SageMaker would be improved with the addition of reporting services."
"The solution is complex to use."
"The solution needs to be cheaper since it now charges per document for extraction."
"Amazon SageMaker could improve in the area of hyperparameter tuning by offering more automated suggestions and tips during the tuning process."
"In terms of performance, I can see there are some issues when you are working with big data. When we are taking it from the Data Lake, we have a lot of issues."
"I would like the visualization for the map of countries to be more easily configurable."
"The scripting for customization could be improved."
"Additional templates would help to get things moving more quickly in terms of getting the reports out."
Earn 20 points
Amazon SageMaker is ranked 5th in Data Science Platforms with 18 reviews while TIBCO Data Science is ranked 25th in Data Science Platforms. Amazon SageMaker is rated 7.2, while TIBCO Data Science is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon SageMaker writes "Easy to use and manage, but the documentation does not have a lot of information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO Data Science writes "A straightforward initial setup and good reporting but needs better documentation". Amazon SageMaker is most compared with Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, Domino Data Science Platform and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, whereas TIBCO Data Science is most compared with TIBCO Statistica, MathWorks Matlab and Dataiku Data Science Studio.
See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.