Apache Spark vs Google Cloud Dataflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,498 views|1,884 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Google Logo
4,813 views|3,977 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Spark and Google Cloud Dataflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop.
To learn more, read our detailed Hadoop Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"With Hadoop-related technologies, we can distribute the workload with multiple commodity hardware.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its flexibility.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its ease of use.""The deployment of the product is easy.""The most valuable feature of Apache Spark is its memory processing because it processes data over RAM rather than disk, which is much more efficient and fast.""The product is useful for analytics.""The most crucial feature for us is the streaming capability. It serves as a fundamental aspect that allows us to exert control over our operations.""The processing time is very much improved over the data warehouse solution that we were using."

More Apache Spark Pros →

"The solution allows us to program in any language we desire.""It is a scalable solution.""The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are the integration, it's very simple if you have the complete stack, which we are using. It is overall very easy to use, user-friendly friendly, and cost-effective if you know how to use it. The solution is very flexible for programmers, if you know how to do scripts or program in Python or any other language, it's extremely easy to use.""I don't need a server running all the time while using the tool. It is also easy to setup. The product offers a pay-as-you-go service.""Google Cloud Dataflow is useful for streaming and data pipelines.""The service is relatively cheap compared to other batch-processing engines.""The best feature of Google Cloud Dataflow is its practical connectedness.""The most valuable features of Google Cloud Dataflow are scalability and connectivity."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Pros →

Cons
"It requires overcoming a significant learning curve due to its robust and feature-rich nature.""Apache Spark provides very good performance The tuning phase is still tricky.""Include more machine learning algorithms and the ability to handle streaming of data versus micro batch processing.""We use big data manager but we cannot use it as conditional data so whenever we're trying to fetch the data, it takes a bit of time.""I would like to see integration with data science platforms to optimize the processing capability for these tasks.""Stream processing needs to be developed more in Spark. I have used Flink previously. Flink is better than Spark at stream processing.""In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, do the transformation in a subsecond, and all that.""The initial setup was not easy."

More Apache Spark Cons →

"The technical support has slight room for improvement.""They should do a market survey and then make improvements.""The solution's setup process could be more accessible.""The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Google Cloud Data Flow can improve by having full simple integration with Kafka topics. It's not that complicated, but it could improve a bit. The UI is easy to use but the experience could be better. There are other tools available that do a better job.""Google Cloud Dataflow should include a little cost optimization.""The deployment time could also be reduced.""I would like Google Cloud Dataflow to be integrated with IT data flow and other related services to make it easier to use as it is a complex tool."

More Google Cloud Dataflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Since we are using the Apache Spark version, not the data bricks version, it is an Apache license version, the support and resolution of the bug are actually late or delayed. The Apache license is free."
  • "Apache Spark is open-source. You have to pay only when you use any bundled product, such as Cloudera."
  • "We are using the free version of the solution."
  • "Apache Spark is not too cheap. You have to pay for hardware and Cloudera licenses. Of course, there is a solution with open source without Cloudera."
  • "Apache Spark is an expensive solution."
  • "Spark is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs."
  • "On the cloud model can be expensive as it requires substantial resources for implementation, covering on-premises hardware, memory, and licensing."
  • "It is an open-source solution, it is free of charge."
  • More Apache Spark Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of the solution depends on many factors, such as how they pay for tools in the company and its size."
  • "Google Cloud is slightly cheaper than AWS."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • "Google Cloud Dataflow is a cheap solution."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven to eight out of ten."
  • "The solution is not very expensive."
  • More Google Cloud Dataflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hadoop solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Spark to process data from different data sources.
    Top Answer:In data analysis, you need to take real-time data from different data sources. You need to process this in a subsecond, and do the transformation in a subsecond
    Top Answer:The product's installation process is easy...The tool's maintenance part is somewhat easy.
    Top Answer:The authentication part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. For some common users, the solution's authentication part is difficult to use. The scalability of the… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 22 in Hadoop
    Views
    2,498
    Comparisons
    1,884
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.7
    7th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    4,813
    Comparisons
    3,977
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    308
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Google Dataflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory

    Google Dataflow is a unified programming model and a managed service for developing and executing a wide range of data processing patterns including ETL, batch computation, and continuous computation. Cloud Dataflow frees you from operational tasks like resource management and performance optimization.
    Sample Customers
    NASA JPL, UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo!, UC Santa Cruz, TripAdvisor, Taboola, Agile Lab, Art.com, Baidu, Alibaba Taobao, EURECOM, Hitachi Solutions
    Absolutdata, Backflip Studios, Bluecore, Claritics, Crystalloids, Energyworx, GenieConnect, Leanplum, Nomanini, Redbus, Streak, TabTale
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    University9%
    Marketing Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hadoop
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Cloudera, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Hadoop. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Spark is ranked 1st in Hadoop with 60 reviews while Google Cloud Dataflow is ranked 7th in Streaming Analytics with 10 reviews. Apache Spark is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud Dataflow is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apache Spark writes "Reliable, able to expand, and handle large amounts of data well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Dataflow writes "Easy to use for programmers, user-friendly, and scalable". Apache Spark is most compared with Spring Boot, AWS Batch, Spark SQL, SAP HANA and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Google Cloud Dataflow is most compared with Databricks, Apache NiFi, Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis and Talend Data Streams.

    We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.