We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
"Our code is secure."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 17 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket Server report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
