Compare APCON vs. cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes

APCON is ranked 7th in Network Packet Broker while cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes is ranked 11th in Network Packet Broker. APCON is rated 0, while cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes is rated 0. On the other hand, APCON is most compared with Gigamon, Ixia Network Packet Brokers and Big Switch Networks, whereas cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes is most compared with Gigamon and Ixia Network Packet Brokers.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
APCON Logo
1,310 views|1,049 comparisons
cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes Logo
256 views|179 comparisons
Ranking
7th
Views
1,310
Comparisons
1,049
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
11th
Views
256
Comparisons
179
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 62% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
cVu
Learn
APCON
cPacket Networks
Overview

cPacket’s cVu Monitoring nodes provide the monitoring layer within your Intelligent Monitoring Fabric. They provide advanced analytics and complete packet inspection across your entire network, give you proactive visibility using custom key performance indicator (KPI) metrics. Powered by our patented Algorithmic Fabric chip, cVu is able to deliver complete packet inspection at full line-rate. By the moving intelligence of your network monitoring closer to the wire, you are able to eliminate bottlenecks, dropped packets and increased latency.

Offer
Learn more about APCON
Learn more about cPacket cVu Monitoring Nodes
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Vodafone
We monitor all Network Packet Broker reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email