"The solution is very user-friendly."
"It monitors all the URLs that a user goes to on their phone and so we can see what they're looking at and we can limit that. Certain topics are not allowed to be accessed. They're monitoring their apps and they rate them based upon how big of a security risk that individual app is based on their ratings. And so we're able to limit those as well and allow people to have some that may be a low risk, but still a risk, but we may allow that for our users whereas we block medium and high risk."
"The anti-phishing and scanning of SMS are the most valuable aspects of the solution. Sometimes we will get some SMS and they will try to redirect you to malicious links. If you have SandBlast Mobile, it helps you prevent clicking on those malicious links."
"It also enables us to see where privacy is a concern, apps that are leaking privacy. Having an idea as to how these apps are being protected offers some level of security to the device and back into our corporate network."
"The easy navigation of the admin portal is a welcome change to how some other admin portals are not very user-friendly."
"We have applied MFA so that no one can bypass this security and the users/employees can access their resources very easily, securely, and seamlessly."
"Management can see all devices on one panel and easily highlight any devices under threat."
"We have had a lot fewer attacks thanks to this solution."
"Allows apps to be distributed to contractor's devices not on company managed MDM."
"Speeds up app deployment and management."
"One of the improvements that can be made is that they become compatible with Google MDM."
"If possible, it would be better if they can include vulnerability management for applications. When a user installs many applications, if there is a way to manage a pack of applications, it would be helpful."
"While it's great, there's always room for improvement. Adding capabilities for automatic deployment in an enterprise environment would be useful."
"We don't have Google MDM being supported by the solution as of yet. It is a feature requirement... They are aware that it is something that I need. My objective is to be able to have the MDM integration and to have some level of control over the asset itself."
"Harmony Mobile could be improved with increased built-in DLP coverage."
"One thing that should be improved in the future of the ability to ensure that mobile devices are protected from connections in environments with unlimited connectivity."
"The feature set between the Android and Apple devices is not fully equal."
"They could make a more beautiful interface."
"Needs a better API."
"Better support for Office 365 integration would help improve it further."
Earn 20 points
Check Point Harmony Mobile is ranked 1st in Mobile Threat Defense with 43 reviews while Digital.ai App Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Threat Defense. Check Point Harmony Mobile is rated 8.8, while Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Mobile writes "Easy to implement, simple to maintain policies, and does not disrupt end-user functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai App Management [EOL] writes "We launched Apperian in June of 2015 to improve quality of deployment process for a native mobile app on Android & iOS, successfully implementing single sign-on with our corporate security". Check Point Harmony Mobile is most compared with Check Point Remote Access VPN, Lookout, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Digital.ai App Management [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Mobile Threat Defense reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
