We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Arena QMS vs. Discus Quality Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
50
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
9
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Arena’s product-centric quality management system (QMS) software enables medical device manufacturers to deliver safe and compliant products to market fast. By connecting quality management processes to the product record, we help distributed teams improve visibility and traceability throughout the entire product lifecycle.

Discus QMS brings all of your quality processes together on a single platform and helps manage and automate them. It has pre-configured workflows, with the ability to change and adapt to any process you need. Discus QMS is a workflow-based software that provides routing of a quality-related event through different departments and stakeholders based on a defined procedure. QMS platforms include the module namely CAPA, deviation, change control, market or customer complaints, OOS and OOT. Discus QMS helps pharmaceutical companies increase efficiency, improve quality, achieve compliance, and reduce risk.

Offer
Learn more about Arena QMS
Learn more about Discus Quality Management
Sample Customers
Potrero, Freewire, Nextracker, Nutanix, Picarro, Kymeta, Truenorth
Dabur, Dishman, Olam, Himalaya, 7 Eleven

Arena QMS is ranked 8th in Quality Management Software while Discus Quality Management is ranked 33rd in Quality Management Software. Arena QMS is rated 0.0, while Discus Quality Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Arena QMS is most compared with , whereas Discus Quality Management is most compared with .

See our list of best Quality Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Quality Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.