We performed a comparison between Armis and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"The most important features are the dashboard and reporting. The dashboard provides statistics with graphs and bar charts for our management."
"Their overall cost of service is pretty good."
"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."
"The most valuable feature of the product is the Assurance Report Card, which gives us an overview of the security poster in just a simple glance."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"One of the most valuable features is their distributed scan model for allotting engines to work together as a pool and handle multiple scans at once, across multiple environments. Automatic scanning distribution is a distinguishing feature of their toolset."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"Tenable SC could improve by making the creation of the initial reports easier that correspond to our network."
"Though the solution's technical support is responsive, they do take a lot of time, making it one of the solution's shortcomings that needs improvement."
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."
"Support could be faster."
"We experienced some difficulties with the solution’s support."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
Armis is ranked 12th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Armis writes "A straightforward and user-friendly solution that can be used for asset intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Claroty Platform and CyberX, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
