We performed a comparison between Aruba ClearPass and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stable with good QBT technology."
"It's very easy to access support and the documentation is self-explanatory."
"What I like most about Aruba ClearPass is its access tracker that serves as its monitoring feature. The access tracker is really helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures."
"It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful."
"Aruba ClearPass's most valuable features are simple accessing, operating, and management. Additionally, the dashboard and performance work well."
"Authentication capabilities are one of the most valuable features."
"Aruba is a highly scalable product. It just works. We have no issues with scalability."
"We find that at the end of the projects we manage, all functionalities perform quite well. We've tested it a lot and find it to be overall a very good solution."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"Aruba ClearPass could improve the complexity of the initial usage. It takes some time to be good at it. It's not simple to build and connect the rules to the network you want to deploy them on."
"After HP, their support is the worst."
"Aruba needs to improve and the processes must be clear."
"The interface could be made easier and more intuitive."
"The user interface could be more polished and modern. It would be useful to have more options for automation."
"In the next version, I would like to see some enhancement or extension on the tracking side. For example, when any user enters the network, it should be more visible in the graphical form."
"Like most security products, ClearPass is difficult to deploy. You need to use the CLI to implement security products from any vendor, so configuring the authentication is complicated."
"The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
Aruba ClearPass is ranked 2nd in Network Access Control (NAC) with 75 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 14th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Aruba ClearPass is rated 8.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Aruba ClearPass writes "Easy to use, multifeatured, and reliable policy management platform for identity authentication and new device onboarding". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Aruba ClearPass is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, Microsoft Intune and Genian NAC, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform and Fortinet FortiNAC. See our Aruba ClearPass vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.