We performed a comparison between Aruba IntroSpect and Cisco Secure Network Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)."The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring. If there is any abnormal behavior on the machine, the administrator will be alerted."
"I haven't heard of any issues with stability."
"Roaming feature, application control and firewall features."
"I value the feature which enables me to detect devices talking to suspect IPs."
"Stability is the most valuable feature we have seen in this solution."
"The solution has increased our threat detection rate. Cisco Stealthwatch has not reduced our incident response times. It has not reduced the amount of time it takes us to detect immediate threats. It has reduced false positives."
"The ability to send data flow from other places and have them all in one place is very valuable for us."
"The most valuable feature is having visibility into the data segments throughout our network."
"Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"The solution reduces the amount of time it takes to detect and remediate threats."
"The feature most valuable for us is to gain visibility of what is actually floating through, so we can stop it based on whether it's good or bad traffic."
"The packet analyzer needs improvement."
"I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard, where you can get the information with a simple click."
"Technical support is a little slow."
"I would like to see a hybrid solution that can work without being connected directly to the internet for those destinations."
"Cisco Stealthwatch can improve by having bundled packages for popular add-ons. It would be a lot easier for people implementing it, have let's say a better way to use the product."
"Its granularity for RBAC roles-based access control needs improvement."
"The initial setup was complex."
"We had some trouble with the installation as we migrated from our previous solution."
"The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified."
"The usability of this solution needs to be improved."
"Complexity on integration is not so straightforward and you really need an expert to help build it out."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba IntroSpect is ranked 16th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 4th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 57 reviews. Aruba IntroSpect is rated 8.6, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba IntroSpect writes "A straightforward setup for technical users and an overall good product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". Aruba IntroSpect is most compared with Arista NDR, LogRhythm UEBA, Darktrace and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.