• Home
  • Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] vs. FortiCache [EOL]

Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] vs FortiCache [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aryaka Logo
Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL]
views| comparisons
Fortinet Logo
FortiCache [EOL]
Read 3 FortiCache [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] and FortiCache [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL]?
Ibrahim Karaeesh
Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."

    • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SmartACCESS
    Learn More
    Aryaka
    Fortinet
    Overview

    Aryaka’s SmartACCESS is the first clientless SD-WAN to software-define remote access. It significantly enhances both on-premises and cloud/SaaS application performance for the remote and mobile workforce without requiring additional hardware or software clients. To achieve this, Aryaka, for the first time, has integrated Dynamic CDN functionality into SD-WAN.

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Sample Customers
    Platform Specialty Products
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] is rated 0.0, while FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". Aryaka SmartACCESS [EOL] is most compared with , whereas FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.