Atos DirX Directory vs IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atos DirX Directory and IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The role and attribute-based access control has been greatly improved.""DirX Directory is the best feature of the product: a very fast, stable LDAP directory.""The solution offers high performance.""The most valuable feature is its knowledge."

More Atos DirX Directory Pros →

"The Verify feature: A push method which customers are going for.""The integration effort with the end application is quite straightforward and easy.""SAML 2.0.""Single Sign-On functionality is valuable because the core purpose of the product is to allow universal (or bespoke) SSO for application suites.""OAuth 2 is now the de facto standard for API protection and scoped authorized delegation. IBM TAM now supports OAuth 2 and can act as fully compliant OAuth 2 authorization server."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Needs more available consultants and implementation partners.""The Self-Service Portal is old school and it lacks easy accessibility for users.""The user interface could be more convenient for people that don't know the tool too intensively.""The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release.""An overall modernization of the product is required in order to keep up with newer products."

More Atos DirX Directory Cons →

"Multi-factor authentication with social integration needs to improve.""Looking at their roadmap, they have a broad grasp of the security features which the industry needs.""The self-service portal needs improvement.""An Amazon Machine Image (AMI) for the newer appliance versions for hosting the virtual appliances on AWS will help.""The profiling element is incredibly robust, but also equally as complex, it requires an off-site course to be able to understand the context or the plethora of options available."

More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The IBM prices are, as ever, extortionate, even with a business partnership, and high levels of discounts."
  • More IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is its knowledge.
    Top Answer:The price could be better. It would be better if they developed a better endpoint solution in the next release.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    68
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Application Infrastructure
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    DirX Directory
    Tivoli Access Manager, IBM Security Access Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    DirX Directory is a standards-compliant, high-performance, highly available, reliable and secure Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and X.500 directory server. It offers unlimited scalability with outstanding read and write performance.

    IBM Tivoli Access Manager is a robust and secure centralized policy management solution for e-business and distributed applications. IBM Tivoli Access Manager WebSEAL is a high performance, multi-threaded Web server that applies fine-grained security policy to the Tivoli Access Manager protected Web object space. WebSEAL can provide single sign-on solutions and incorporate back-end Web application server resources into its security policy.
    Sample Customers
    National Savings and Investments, Vehicle and Operator Services Agency
    Essex Technology Group Inc.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Construction Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Government25%
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Insurance Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atos DirX Directory is ranked 19th in Application Infrastructure with 4 reviews while IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Atos DirX Directory is rated 6.8, while IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Atos DirX Directory writes "An identity management system with valuable knowledge". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] writes "Reverse proxy means applications need only minimal changes to support SSO with ISAM". Atos DirX Directory is most compared with One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas IBM Tivoli Access Manager [EOL] is most compared with .

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.