Compare Autodesk Moldflow vs. MSC NASTRAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Autodesk Moldflow Logo
612 views|290 comparisons
MSC NASTRAN Logo
3,567 views|3,278 comparisons
Ranking
4th
out of 4 in CAE
Views
612
Comparisons
290
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 4 in CAE
Views
3,567
Comparisons
3,278
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Moldflow
NASTRAN
Learn More
Overview

Engineers and analysts use Moldflow software for plastic injection molding simulation to improve plastic part designs, injection mold designs, and manufacturing processes.

MSC Nastran is a multidisciplinary structural analysis application used by engineers to perform static, dynamic, and thermal analysis across the linear and nonlinear domains, complemented with automated structural optimization and award winning embedded fatigue analysis technologies, all enabled by high performance computing.
Offer
Learn more about Autodesk Moldflow
Learn more about MSC NASTRAN
Sample Customers
Primera Plastics, Rheomold, Minda Industries Limited, forteq Nidau AG, Automotive Lighting Reutlingen GmbH
Boiler Structure, Framework Construction
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Computer Software Company15%
Manufacturing Company12%
Government7%

Autodesk Moldflow is ranked 4th in CAE while MSC NASTRAN is ranked 1st in CAE. Autodesk Moldflow is rated 0.0, while MSC NASTRAN is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Autodesk Moldflow is most compared with ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering, whereas MSC NASTRAN is most compared with MSC PATRAN and ANSYS Computer Aided Engineering.

See our list of best CAE vendors.

We monitor all CAE reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.