We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."
"It's not only web-based but also for backend applications; you can also do the integration of the applications."
"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways."
"It's simple to set up."
"For traditional automation, approximately half of our tests end up automated. Therefore, we are saving half the testing time by pushing it off to automation. That gives it an intrinsic benefit of more time for manual testers and business testers to work on possibly more important and interesting things. For some of our applications, they don't just have to do happy path testing anymore, they can go more in-depth and breadth into the process."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."
"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."
"One thing that confused me, and now just mildly irritates me, is that we migrated from QuickTest Pro to HP UFT, Unified Functional Test. After we did the migration, it turned out that we didn't really have Unified Functional Test at all."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
"The solution is expensive."
"The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well."
"They should include an automated feature to load backlog tests."
AutonomIQ TestIQ is ranked 20th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews. AutonomIQ TestIQ is rated 9.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutonomIQ TestIQ writes "A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". AutonomIQ TestIQ is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
