We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while Harness is ranked 12th in Build Automation with 1 review. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
