We performed a comparison between AWS CodeBuild and Digital.ai Release based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation."The integration with other AWS services has streamlined our workflow."
"The integration is a good feature."
"It works seamlessly with AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR)."
"The integration is a good feature."
"The solution provides good integrations."
"The solution can apply one template across multiple applications."
"The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that."
"The time is also reduced because the manual work has tremendously decreased. We just have to click one button, and it will create everything for us."
"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes."
"While working on building images for multiple applications within a single script, I encountered an issue where looping functionality was not supported as expected."
"There is no persistent storage or preservation of workspace between the builds."
"The deployment fails sometimes."
"They can further improve the integration of the Bitbucket for CodeBuild."
"Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial."
"The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill."
"Currently, we put artifact details manually. What we could improve, in our case, is the deployment instruction base. Developers input all the information, including which artifact and where it needs to be deployed. What Digital.ai could do is automatically go to the deployment instruction page, take those artifact details, and implement them."
"The solution is a little bit expensive."
AWS CodeBuild is ranked 9th in Build Automation with 4 reviews while Digital.ai Release is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 4 reviews. AWS CodeBuild is rated 8.8, while Digital.ai Release is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS CodeBuild writes "Provides good integrations, is flexible, and has a comparable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Release writes "Effectively automates deployments and applies one template across applications". AWS CodeBuild is most compared with Jenkins, GitLab, CircleCI, GitHub Actions and Tekton, whereas Digital.ai Release is most compared with Jenkins, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, IBM Rational Build Forge and Digital.ai Deploy.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.