We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Informatica Data Integration Hub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."I appreciate AWS Glue for its cost-effectiveness."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is scalability."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Glue is its ease of use and good documentation. Additionally, we can do all the transformations that we need."
"I also like that you can add custom libraries like JAR files and use them. So, the ability to use a fast processing engine and embed basic jobs easily are significant advantages."
"I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"I like its integration and ability to handle all data-related tasks."
"It is a stable and scalable solution."
"The key role for Glue is that it hosts our metadata before rolling out our actual data. This is the major advantage of using this solution and our clients client have been very satisfied with it."
"The technical support services are good."
"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."
"The MDM solution is capable of integrating multiple systems, so it helped us to solve the purpose of centralizing the depository as well as the standardization of mass data. It takes away all the ambiguity around data integrity issues or all the process challenges which happen when every stage of a process uses a different source as master data."
"AWS Glue is more costly compared to other tools like Airflow."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"On occasion, the solution's dashboard reports that a project failed due to runtime but it actually succeeded."
"It fails to handle massive databases acquired from various sources."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"When it comes to UI look and feel and user experience, Informatica is not as good as other solutions."
"They could provide more robust performance for data integration processes. It would help in improving the data quality more efficiently."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."
More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 37th in Data Integration with 3 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "Excellent at standardizing mass data and capable of integrating with multiple solutions ". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Data Hub.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.