We performed a comparison between AWS Glue and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."AWS Glue is a good solution for developers, they have the ability to write code in different languages and other software."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"AWS Glue is a stable and easy-to-use solution."
"Transformations are valuable because you can modify or override complex data logic from an open source or Spark to solve issues."
"The most valuable features currently are glue studio, jobs, and triggers."
"One of the best features of the solution is its ability to easily integrate with other AWS services."
"The product has a valuable feature for data catalog."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"It is not clear how the partition discovery would have been affected by more data coming in."
"The solution's visual ETL tool is of no use for actual implementation."
"In terms of performance, if they can further optimize the execution time for serverless jobs, it would be a welcome improvement."
"The technical support for this solution could be improved. In future, we would like to connect more services like Athena or Kinesis to help control more loads of data."
"I would like to see a more robust interface on the no-code side. This would be nice to be able to split cells."
"I have encountered challenges with multi-region support."
"The solution should offer features for streaming data in addition to batching data."
"The product has only a few built-in transformations."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 18th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews. AWS Glue is rated 7.8, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Talend Open Studio, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.