AWS IoT TwinMaker vs OpenText IoT Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
9th
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
205
Comparisons
163
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
82
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
AWS IoT Things Graph
Learn More
Overview
AWS IoT TwinMaker makes it easier for developers to create digital twins of real-world systems such as buildings, factories, industrial equipment, and production lines. AWS IoT TwinMaker provides the tools you need to build digital twins to help you optimize building operations, increase production output, and improve equipment performance. With the ability to use existing data from multiple sources, create virtual representations of any physical environment, and combine existing 3D models with real-world data, you can now harness digital twins to create a holistic view of your operations faster and with less effort.

The OpenText IoT Platform provides an identity-centric approach to managing day to day operations of industrial assets and connected things. ... Transforms the operation of downstream business systems and improves customer engagement, using lifecycle data obtained from industrial assets.

Sample Customers
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
The Auto Club Group (ACG), SITE Centers, Hospital system, Temperzone Australia

AWS IoT TwinMaker is ranked 9th in IoT Platforms while OpenText IoT Platform is ranked 21st in IoT Platforms. AWS IoT TwinMaker is rated 0.0, while OpenText IoT Platform is rated 0.0. On the other hand, AWS IoT TwinMaker is most compared with , whereas OpenText IoT Platform is most compared with .

See our list of best IoT Platforms vendors.

We monitor all IoT Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.