We performed a comparison between AWS Security Hub and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: AWS Security Hub is highly praised for its integration capabilities and real-time alert capabilities. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is valued for its excellent vulnerability protection, login inspection, and control over restrictions for server access and application installation. Additionally, Cloud One provides valuable visibility inside microservice architecture and between pods. AWS Security Hub has room for improvement in terms of integration options, user interface, and multi-cloud compatibility. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvement in pricing, automation, setup, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: The technical support provided by AWS Security Hub was described as prompt and good, whereas Trend Micro Cloud One's support was consistently praised and rated highly. Trend Micro Cloud One was noted for having a shared support center with 100 resources deployed 24/7, and customers rated their technical support for Container Security at nine or ten out of ten.
Ease of Deployment: AWS Security Hub is easy to set up and requires minimal maintenance, while Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be more complex and time-consuming, depending on the user's technical skills and environment. AWS Security Hub requires policy configuration, while Trend Micro Cloud One requires daily monitoring and maintenance and can take up to a month to deploy.
Pricing: AWS Security Hub has a fair and acceptable setup cost, whereas Trend Micro Cloud One's cost falls within the average range and depends on the number of units. Although Trend Micro may require additional services, its basic service offers a solid foundation for monitoring infrastructure.
ROI: AWS Security Hub seems to have a positive outcome, while Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its flexibility and easy integration.
Comparison Results: AWS Security Hub is a better choice than Trend Micro Cloud One according to user reviews, as it has strong integration capabilities, real-time alerts, and detailed compliance alerts. Trend Micro Cloud One does have good vulnerability protection and workload management, but it is criticized for its high cost, lack of automation and robustness, and complex setup process.
"With Wiz, we get timely alerts for leaked data or any vulnerabilities already existing in our environment."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to manage...It is a scalable solution."
"The platform has valuable features for security."
"Very good at detection and providing real-time alerts."
"I really like the seamless integration with the AWS account structure. It can even be made mandatory as part of the landing zone. These are great features. And there's a single pane of glass for the entire account."
"AWS Security Hub has very good integration features. It allows for AWS native services integration, and it helps us to integrate some of the services outside of AWS. They have partners, such as Amazon Preferred Network Partners (APN). If you have different security tools around APN, we can integrate those findings with AWS Security Hub reducing the need to refer to different portals or different UIs. You can have AWS Security Hub act as a single common go-to dashboard."
"I find all of the features to be highly valuable."
"Finding out if your infrastructure is secure is a valuable feature."
"Cloudposse is a valuable feature as it guarantees my security."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The stability is quite good."
"The security is good."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"Wiz's reporting capabilities could be refined a bit. They are making headway on that, but more executive-style dashboards would be nice. They just implemented a community aspect where you can share documents and feedback. This was something users had been requesting for a while. They are listening to customer feedback and making changes."
"One aspect that could be improved in the solution is its adaptability to different markets and geopolitical restrictions. In certain regions like Thailand, specific services from certain countries or providers, such as AWS or Azure, might be limited or blocked. It also needs improvement in would require configuring the solution more adaptable to AWS infrastructure and function."
"The telemetry doesn't always go into the control center. When you have multiple instances running in AWS, you need a control tower to take feeds from Security Hub and analyze your results. Sometimes exemptions aren't passed between the control tower and Security Hub. The configuration gets mixed up or you don't get the desired results."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need to add more compliance since, right now, AWS Security Hub only provides four to five compliances to control the tool."
"It is not flexible for multi-cloud environments."
"We need more granular-level customizations to enable or disable the rules in AWS Security Hub."
"It's not user-friendly. Too much going on, too many unnecessary findings, not very visual. You can't do much compared to other similar tools that are cheaper and better."
"AWS Security Hub should improve the time it takes to update. It takes a long period of time when updating. It can take 24 hours sometimes to update. Additionally, when integrating this solution with more security tools, takes time."
"Security needs to be measured based on their own criteria. We can't add custom criteria specific to our organization. For example, having an S3 bucket publicly available might be flagged as a critical alert, but it might not be critical in a sandbox environment. So, it gets flagged as critical, which becomes a false positive. So, customization options and creating custom dashboards would be areas for improvement."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Security Hub is ranked 14th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 16 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. AWS Security Hub is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS Security Hub writes "A centralized dashboard that enables efficient monitoring and management of possible security issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". AWS Security Hub is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Splunk Enterprise Security and Google Chronicle Suite, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Orca Security. See our AWS Security Hub vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
