AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
JSCAPE by Redwood Logo
933 views|382 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] and JSCAPE by Redwood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Being able to have the S3 files as storage is most valuable. We can use S3 as storage instead of an SFTP server or a machine.""The solution offers good data recovery.""The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization."

More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Pros →

"It is platform-independent and can flawlessly work on any operating system using the latest security standards.""Triggers are also something that is useful as they automate the use of boilerplate code.""The user interface feels easy to use.""The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.""JSCAPE's automation can obliterate manual file transfer processes, salvaging precious time and vanquishing the chances of errors.""We can send the data quickly and securely.""Valuable features include a comprehensive management UI and a strictly controlled managed file transfer.""It is easy to transfer large sets of files."

More JSCAPE by Redwood Pros →

Cons
"The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled.""Its cost needs improvement. In addition, there could be a universal client that works on all desktops.""Could be more automated, particularly for file transfers."

More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Cons →

"They could create an in-depth document so that any user with little to no background can implement this and use the software effectively.""Providing initial guidance would help new users to understand the UI.""Enhancing the user interface would make it more accessible and appealing to the new users and it will definitely enhance the user experience.""Database crashing was seen whenever there was an overload.""The product's pricing needs improvement.""The price is too high and the product line is too complex.""The initial setup and configuration are time-consuming.""The initial setup is time-consuming; it could use a video tutorial."

More JSCAPE by Redwood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."
  • More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The software is expensive compared to other vendors."
  • More JSCAPE by Redwood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization.
    Top Answer:The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled.
    Top Answer:We have integrations with third-party systems that unfortunately make use of a very old-school, file-based protocol. Instead of an API or HTTP-based protocol where you make a request to an endpoint… more »
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.
    Top Answer:The software is expensive compared to other vendors. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    933
    Comparisons
    382
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    510
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

    JSCAPE platform offers independent managed file transfer (MFT) software that allows users to secure and automate data exchange with trading partners, clients and internal transfers. Built-in security features and audit functions support PCI DSS, HIPAA, GLBA and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. SaaS (MFTaaS) offering available.

    Sample Customers
    Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV
    BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Logistics Company38%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Printing Company25%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 3 reviews while JSCAPE by Redwood is ranked 8th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 21 reviews. AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] is rated 8.0, while JSCAPE by Redwood is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] writes "Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JSCAPE by Redwood writes "Versatile, streamlines the entire file transfer procedure, and offers good support". AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, MOVEit, Kiteworks, CA XCOM Data Transport and Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, whereas JSCAPE by Redwood is most compared with MOVEit, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT, Control-M, ActiveBatch by Redwood and Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.