We performed a comparison between Azure Container Registry and Red Hat Quay based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The scanning of Docker images is the most valuable feature."
"The solution has built-in resiliency and replication zone availability so it is very stable."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"The solution allows you to isolate standard containers, which is its most valuable feature. Azure Container Registry does what it's supposed to do and gives you visibility into the Docker images, the logs, information on pulling and pushing the data, etc."
"Feature-wise, the security model and access controls are pretty straightforward and valuable"
"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to download, install and manage."
"It's great for storing images on containers."
"Provides secure duplication and the option for service webhooks."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
"It's not an open source, and we pay per hour to Microsoft Azure."
"The accessibility of Azure Container Registry also has room for improvement because the solution is not always accessible 24 x 7. I experienced this three times when the service wasn't responding, so I could not push or pull images, and I had to decommission Azure Container Registry and redeploy it."
"Lacks the option of having access keys stored in a master key vault."
"The solution has no areas that need improvement."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"The setup for Azure Container Registry was a bit complex. Still, the main problem was that whenever a new image was generated, that new Docker image needed to be updated in Azure Container Registry."
"The solution has become more popular in the last few years but I find that the technical support has not increased their knowledge base, so more knowledgeable support staff can help improve the solution."
"They can improve their scalability."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
Earn 20 points
Azure Container Registry is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 16 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 6th in Container Registry. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Configurations are quite simple with tokens that set folder structure or access levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry, Harbor and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, JFrog Container Registry, Amazon ECR and VMware Harbor Registry.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
