Compare Azure Container Registry vs. Red Hat Quay
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Pricing is reasonable."
"The portability and elasticity features are the most valuable."
"One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure."
"It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for."
Cons
"Implementation needs improvement. We have a lot of open, online sources. Doing a deployment is easy for us. The only issue is when we have VPN connections and we try to pull the images from Container images to the local Dockers, it slows down."
"It should be easier to use. It can have more graphical interfaces to manage containers. At present, the handling or management of the containers is very basic."
"The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy."
"It could be more integrated with other platforms."
"Azure is a bit expensive."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Registry solutions are best for your needs.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: One of the benefits of this solution is that it's private and secure.
Top Answer: Azure is a bit expensive.
Top Answer: It's difficult to find areas of improvement. I have always found it to be better than any CI/CD pipeline. The deployment is an area that needs improvement, as it can take some time to deploy.
Top Answer: It's easy to use, and it does what it is meant for.
Top Answer: Our customers pay for their license for the product. We just provide them with support whenever they need it. We don't deal with any customer license issues.
Top Answer: We had an older version of Red Hat that was not fully integrated into the registry. We had to correct some files and some of the configurations to get it working. It could be more integrated with… more »
Views
328
Comparisons
244
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
491
Rating
8.7
Views
775
Comparisons
693
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
425
Rating
8.0
Compared 47% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 68% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Microsoft Azure Container Registry
Azure Container Registry allows you to build, store, and manage container images and artifacts in a private registry for all types of container deployments. Use Azure container registries with your existing container development and deployment pipelines. Use Azure Container Registry Tasks to build container images in Azure on-demand, or automate builds triggered by source code updates, updates to a container's base image, or timers.
Red Hat Quay is a private container registry that stores, builds, and deploys container images. It analyzes your images for security vulnerabilities, identifying potential issues that can help you mitigate security risks.
Learn more about Azure Container Registry
Learn more about Red Hat Quay
DNV GL, Alaska Airlines, Finastra
The Asiakastieto Group, Akbank, TTTECH
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider18%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company27%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Azure Container Registry is ranked 2nd in Container Registry with 3 reviews while Red Hat Quay is ranked 3rd in Container Registry with 1 review. Azure Container Registry is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Quay is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Container Registry writes "Easy to use, private, secure, and it performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Quay writes "A stable repository that is easy to use and easy to install". Azure Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, JFrog Container Registry and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas Red Hat Quay is most compared with Harbor, VMware Harbor Registry, JFrog Container Registry and Amazon ECR.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.