We performed a comparison between Azure Key Vault and BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Key Vault is very affordable, with charges of less than a dollar for over ten thousand keys."
"It is a managed service in Azure, you do not have to worry about security other than managing your own identities."
"I am satisfied with the product overall."
"The product's integration capabilities are good."
"We use Azure Key Vault for securing secret connection streams, like API secrets, Azure services Secret Key, and AD Client Secret."
"Among the features that have helped improve our security posture are storing secrets in a secure location to create a trusted situation, trusted resources, and incorporating identity access management so that we know who has access to what."
"This solution speeds up the product development life cycle. That is, the time from the development of the product to the time to market is drastically reduced because of the CI/CD pipelines. You can have your code deployed within a matter of minutes."
"We use Azure Key Vault to store secrets."
"A sophisticated and mature solution."
"The most valuable features of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe are the ease of use and the API is very nice. Additionally, the interface is very good between AD and Unix."
"DevOps Secrets Safe allows you to customize a lot of rules."
"The local administrator can manage all the user's logins in one, simple, straight-away account access. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
"The solution does not allow you to integrate with XML parties if it is not inside Azure itself."
"While it is reliable, enhancing security and protection should always be the priority."
"There are additional charges for data transfers. However, the pricing is mostly reasonable for the licensing overall."
"Azure Key Vault takes time to fetch values while integrating it with the code written in .NET format."
"If multiple clouds are to be used it can be difficult and a third party should assist in the implementation."
"It is complicated to use different services and products along with Azure Key Vault."
"There's room for improvement in cross-platform compatibility."
"The solution needs to improve reliability and protection."
"We had some issues with the solution and once we contacted support they eventually solved the problem. They could improve their response time."
"The support for the solution is not very good, they could improve by being quicker."
"You need to improvise many of the customized rules, which can lead to some errors. BeyondTrust should reduce the error rate."
"The product contains some bugs."
More BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Key Vault is ranked 1st in Enterprise Password Managers with 46 reviews while BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is ranked 14th in Enterprise Password Managers with 4 reviews. Azure Key Vault is rated 8.6, while BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Key Vault writes "Allows us to securely store our keys to prevent unauthorized access to unwanted users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe writes "Integrates well between AD and Unix, scalable, and easy to use". Azure Key Vault is most compared with AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, AWS Certificate Manager and Delinea Secret Server, whereas BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, BeyondTrust Password Safe and Delinea Secret Server. See our Azure Key Vault vs. BeyondTrust DevOps Secrets Safe report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.