We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Azure Security Center vs. McAfee Cloud Workload Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Morphisec and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Provides a very good view of the entire security setup of your organization.""The most valuable feature is that it's intuitive. It's very intuitive.""The dashboard is very good. It gives our clients a lot of information and allows them to have a complete overview of the system. Everything is visible in one glance.""The most valuable features of this solution are the remote workforce capabilities and the general experience of the remote workforce.""It takes very little effort to integrate it. It also gives very good visibility into what exactly is happening.""The technical support is very good.""It's quite a good product. It helps to understand the infections and issues you are facing.""Good compliance policies."

More Azure Security Center Pros »

"The discovery feature is the most valuable. After you integrate your cloud environment, maybe an Azure or AWS, or a private environment hosted on VMware, it automatically starts discovering the number of servers that are running on that cloud and the number of services that you have done. It is a beautiful feature because, from a security standpoint, it is difficult to identify which VM is compliant or not when you keep on provisioning a number of VMs in the cloud. It also checks for compliance. It checks whether a system is compliant and whether antivirus is installed on a VM. If an antivirus is installed, it checks whether the antivirus is updated to the latest signature package or not. All these things are beautifully done by McAfee Cloud Workload Security. For communicating with the McAfee server, you need to install an agent on the VM. McAfee Cloud Workload Security gives you a direct opportunity to install an agent on a Windows machine. If you have a Windows cloud, you can directly push that agent onto the VM through your McAfee portal. It provides you a single dashboard view of all servers present in the cloud. It shows the servers on which the antivirus is already installed as well as the servers for which the antivirus installation is still pending. This dashboard view is a much-needed thing. It also has a centralized management, which makes it easy to use."

More McAfee Cloud Workload Security Pros »

Cons
"No possibility to write or edit any capability.""When you work with it, the only problem that we're struggling with is that we have 21 different subscriptions we're trying to apply security to. It's impossible to keep everything organized.""The solution is quite complex. A lot of the different policies that actually get applied don't pertain to every client. If you need to have something open for a client application to work, then you get dinged for having a port open or having an older version of TLS available.""Pricing could be improved. There are limited options based on pricing for the government.""From a compliance standpoint, they can include some more metrics and some specific compliances such as GDPR.""It needs to be simplified and made more user-friendly for a non-technical person.""The initial setup is not actually so complex but it feels complex because there are many add-ons. There are many options and my team needs to be aware of all of these changes happening on the backend which is a distraction.""The documentation and implementation guides could be improved."

More Azure Security Center Cons »

"Its vulnerability assessment is not the best. We cannot identify the vulnerabilities that are related to the operating system by using McAfee Cloud Workload Security. I wish McAfee would add a vulnerability assessment tool that will not only identify the vulnerability but will also be able to generate a report so that the required patching can be done for the servers. Currently, McAfee Cloud Workload Security only integrates with AWS and Azure. If it can also integrate with GCP, Alibaba, and other cloud services available in the market, it would be good because not all people are using Azure and AWS."

More McAfee Cloud Workload Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I'm not privy to that information, but I know it's probably close to a million dollars a year.""We are using the free version of the Azure Security Center.""This is a worldwide service and depending on the country, there will be different prices.""Security Center charges $15 per resource for any workload that you onboard into it. They charge per VM or per data-base server or per application. It's not like Microsoft 365 licensing, where there are levels like E3 and E5. Security Center is pretty straightforward.""There is a helpful cost-reducing option that allows you to integrate production subscriptions with non-production subscriptions.""Its pricing is a little bit high in terms of Azure Security Center, but the good thing is that we don't need to maintain and deploy it. So, while the pricing is high, it is native to Azure which is why we prefer using this tool.""I am not involved in this area. However, I believe its price is okay because even small customers are using Azure Security Center. I don't think it is very expensive.""The cost of the license is based on the subscriptions that you have."

More Azure Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is not an expensive product. I am in the Indian market, and it is one of the most reliable and cost-effective solutions."

More McAfee Cloud Workload Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a… more »
Top Answer: The integration with Logic Apps allows for automated responses to incidents.
Top Answer: This is a worldwide service and depending on the country, there will be different prices. There is a price calculator for Azure Services. You select the service that you are interested in, and the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
4th
Views
3,552
Comparisons
2,738
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
878
Rating
8.0
11th
Views
271
Comparisons
184
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,118
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Microsoft Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC
Learn More
Overview

Azure Security Center protects your Azure and hybrid resources. Microsoft uses a wide variety of physical, infrastructure, and operational controls to help secure Azure—but there are additional actions you need to take to help safeguard your workloads. Turn on Azure Security Center to strengthen your cloud security posture. Within Azure Security Center, use Azure Defender to protect your hybrid cloud workloads. With Azure Security Center, you can:

- Assess and visualize the security state of your resources in Azure, on-premises, and in other clouds with Azure Secure Score

- Simplify enterprise compliance and view your compliance against regulatory requirements

- Protect all your hybrid cloud workloads with Azure Defender, which is integrated with Security Center

- Use AI and automation to cut through false alarms, quickly identify threats, and streamline threat investigation

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Azure Security Center Community.

Workload security from on-prem to cloud.

Automate Discovery and Deployment:
Automation templates and continuous workload discovery for day-1 protection and a centralized view of instances across all accounts.

Visualize and Control Network Threats:
Cloud-native network visualization, prioritized risk alerting, and micro-segmentation for awareness and control to prevent both lateral attacks in the data center and external threats.

Defend Workloads Against Advanced Attacks:
Integrated countermeasures to protect workloads spanning machine learning, application containment, virtual machine-optimized anti-malware, whitelisting, file integrity monitoring, and micro-segmentation.

Discover and Defend:
CWS automates discovery and defense of elastic workloads to eliminate blind spots, deliver advanced threat defense and simplify management.

Simplify Cloud Security Management:
A single-pane console consolidates policy and management across physical, virtual, and multi-cloud environments.

Reduce Complexity:
Simplify security with centralized management, automated workloads, one-click quarantine, and the ability to take corrective actions from within the solution.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Security Center
Learn more about McAfee Cloud Workload Security
Sample Customers
Azure Security Center is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company27%
Retailer9%
Insurance Company9%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, Morphisec and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: October 2021.
542,608 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Security Center is ranked 4th in Cloud Workload Security with 19 reviews while McAfee Cloud Workload Security is ranked 11th in Cloud Workload Security with 1 review. Azure Security Center is rated 8.0, while McAfee Cloud Workload Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Security Center writes "Provides us with recommendations for improving security and enables benchmarking of infrastructure for compliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Cloud Workload Security writes "Automatically discovers the number of servers and checks for compliance". Azure Security Center is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Amazon GuardDuty, Azure Defender and Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, whereas McAfee Cloud Workload Security is most compared with Trend Micro Cloud One Workload Security, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Symantec Storage Protection.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.